Hi all
I've been following the threads of this discussion with interest, as
usual. One thing puzzles me:
Steve Hitchcock wrote:
> The need for
> preservation is an original source copy - representing the author's
> intent - and then to document any transformations.
This sounds like an intentional fallacy in the making! Can an author's
intent not be exactly a nicely typeset, printer-ready PDF?
Cheers!
Richard
--
/
\ Richard M Davis
/ Digital Archives Specialist
\ University of London Computer Centre
/ Tel: +44 (0) 20 7692 1350
\ mailto: [log in to unmask]
/
|