JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SURVEILLANCE Archives


SURVEILLANCE Archives

SURVEILLANCE Archives


SURVEILLANCE@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SURVEILLANCE Home

SURVEILLANCE Home

SURVEILLANCE  November 2006

SURVEILLANCE November 2006

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

AW: BBC News Online: Britain is 'surveillance society'

From:

Eric Toepfer <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Eric Toepfer <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 3 Nov 2006 23:58:36 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (162 lines)

Well, and Germany - thanks to his dark past - has more national ID cards
(already envisioned to become biometric) and is allegedly "world class" in
wiretapping. If comparing the degree of surveillance I would be careful to
focus on particular technologies and even if - I remind of Gary Marx´s
artcicle in the first issue of "Surveillance & Society". 

Or was this meant as political statement to make Britons aware rather than
other nations relieved? Though I also found the UK information commissioner
rather tame (would be interesting to know more about his institutional
embeddedness and future career opportunities) compared to the more
experienced German colleagues. However, the latter are also under constant
fire by the hardliners of "Innere Sicherheit" and data protection is
increasingly represented as offender protection. Thus, I suspect that we
"sleep-walk" together.

More than five years ago critical German lawyers concluded that legislation
in the field of policing following the landmark Census Verdict of the
Federal Constitutional Court and its declaration of the right to
informational self-determination has lead to an "overregulated absence of
regulation", and data protection offices are staffed with a handful of
people who are just a drop in the ocean of collected data and its abuses.

Eric

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Research and teaching on surveillance
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] Im Auftrag von James Ferryman
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. November 2006 12:53
An: [log in to unmask]
Betreff: BBC News Online: Britain is 'surveillance society'

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6108496.stm

Text:

Britain is 'surveillance society'

There could be up to 4.2 million UK CCTV cameras, the report says Fears that
the UK would "sleep-walk into a surveillance society" have become a reality,
the government's information commissioner has said.
Richard Thomas, who said he raised concerns two years ago, spoke after
research found people's actions were increasingly being monitored.

The Surveillance Studies Network report said there are up to 4.2m CCTV
cameras - about one for every 14 people.

Other techniques are used to record work rate, buying habits and movements.

Surveillance will increase in the next decade, the report added.

'Looser laws'

The report's co-writer Dr David Murakami-Wood told BBC News that, compared
to other industrialised Western states, the UK was "the most surveilled
country".

"We have more CCTV cameras and we have looser laws on privacy and data
protection," he said.

"We really do have a society which is premised both on state secrecy and the
state not giving up its supposed right to keep information under control
while, at the same time, wanting to know as much as it can about us."

People grumble about data protection, but boy is it important in this new
age

Richard Thomas
Information Commissioner

The research says surveillance ranges from the US national security agency
monitoring all telecommunications traffic passing through Britain to key
stroke information used to gauge work rates and global positioning satellite
information tracking company vehicles.

The report also highlights "dataveillance" - the combination of credit card,
mobile phone and loyalty card information for marketing purposes.

Mr Thomas called for a debate about the risks if information gathered is
wrong or falls into the wrong hands.

"We've got to say where do we want the lines to be drawn? How much do we
want to have surveillance changing the nature of society in a democratic
nation?" he told the BBC.

"We're not luddites, we're not technophobes, but we are saying not least
don't forget the fundamental importance of data protection, which I'm
responsible for.

"Sometimes it gets dismissed as something which is rather bureaucratic, it
stops you sorting out your granny's electricity bills. People grumble about
data protection, but boy is it important in this new age.

"When data protection puts those fundamental safeguards in place, we must
make sure that some of these lines are not crossed."

'Balance needed'

The report will be presented to the 28th International Data Protection and
Privacy Commissioners' Conference in London on Thursday, hosted by the
Information Commissioner's Office.

  Have Your Say
  If it prevents criminal behaviour or improves its detection I'm all for
it.

Mark Jones, Plymouth


Send us your comments

The office is an independent body established to promote access to official
data and to protect personal details.

The Department for Constitutional Affairs (DCA) said there needed to be a
balance between sharing information responsibly and respecting the citizen's
rights.

A spokesman said: "Massive social and technological advances have occurred
in the last few decades and will continue in the years to come.

"We must rise to the challenges and seize the opportunities it provides for
individual citizens and society as a whole."

Graham Gerrard from the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) said
there were safeguards against the abuse of surveillance by officers.

"The police use of surveillance is probably the most regulated of any group
in society," he told the BBC.

"Richard Thomas was particularly concerned about unseen, uncontrolled or
excessive surveillance. Well, any of the police surveillance that is unseen
is in fact controlled and has to be proportionate otherwise it would never
get authorised."

****************************************************
This is a message from the SURVEILLANCE listserv for research and teaching
in surveillance studies.

To unsubscribe, please send the following message to
<[log in to unmask]>:

UNSUBSCRIBE SURVEILLANCE

For further help, please visit:

http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help
****************************************************

****************************************************
This is a message from the SURVEILLANCE listserv
for research and teaching in surveillance studies.

To unsubscribe, please send the following message to
<[log in to unmask]>:

UNSUBSCRIBE SURVEILLANCE

For further help, please visit:

http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help
****************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
August 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
June 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager