JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PRACTITIONER-RESEARCHER Archives


PRACTITIONER-RESEARCHER Archives

PRACTITIONER-RESEARCHER Archives


PRACTITIONER-RESEARCHER@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PRACTITIONER-RESEARCHER Home

PRACTITIONER-RESEARCHER Home

PRACTITIONER-RESEARCHER  October 2006

PRACTITIONER-RESEARCHER October 2006

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: What are living standards of judgement?

From:

MATTHIAS MEIERS <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

BERA Practitioner-Researcher <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:03:36 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (106 lines)

Hello,
 
 
I hear Je Kan playfully wondering about

*	
	the line that practitioners walk between ethical practice both as to what the practitioner and institution deems
	as ethical

*	
	the inclusional answer to aggressive invasive seeds

I found the garden metaphor a little confusing. Isn't action research a sustained inquiry into agency. To me, the word agency means, the difference my presence makes in the lives of my students and to our shared experiences in the institution. The institution comes to life through us, policy makers, parents, students and practitioners. I cannot place myself outside it and be a responsible agent within it. Being an ethical agent within the institution means enacting purposes, as well as, problematizing and reshaping hurtful practices. Fundamentally, this entails an appeal to moral and ethical reasons for educational policy and action.

What happens when competing visions emerge, as Je Kan reminded me? I believe that the answer lies in creating time and space for a moral and ethical conversation that would allow people to talk about the practical consequences of these visions and ask what kind of lifeworld are we creating for each other here.

Sarah's words are inviting me to rethink agency

*	
	As a photographer I choose the subject and the framing of the subject and when I talk about the loving eye of the camera I am describing how I (try to) bring an empathetic focus that communicates the essence of what I see. 

I have been using narrative inquiry to understand my agency in the classroom and to construct a better understanding of what the students are doing. How does narrative help me focus on the experiences of my students? This is the question I hear Sarah ask me.

Greetings from Winnipeg,

Matthias



________________________________

From: BERA Practitioner-Researcher on behalf of Sarah Fletcher
Sent: Tue 10/10/2006 4:15 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: What are living standards of judgement?



Dear Je Kan/All,

Thank you! You have hit on something that really
fascinates me!  It's the notion of metaphor as a
standard of judgement - and I so like the image of the
rose as a weed being its rose-like self & to the best
of its ability but in the wrong location and
inadvertently courting destruction.

As a photographer I choose the subject and the framing
of the subject and when I talk about the loving eye of
the camera I am describing how I (try to) bring an
empathetic focus that communicates the essence of what
I see.  How does this relate to educational research
mentoring and living educational stanards of
judgement?  Well - if for example I work with a
teacher who sees mentoring as 'equal connectedness'
then I will do what I can as I video to embody that
metaphor on film.  If they perceived mentoring as
'benevolent hierarchy' I would employ the lens
differently.  That's not to say one form of metaphor
or mentoring is superior but different. Both can be
appropriate in different locations.

Sometimes a mentor has to be directive (rather like Je
Kan may decide what is to be weeded out) and sometimes
working alongside). A good gardener retains strong
plants and doesn't feel threatened by strength.
Balancing colour and vigour and form s/he may nurture
'weeds' that a less expereienced gardener burns.  The
art of gardening is 'balancing'.
A good mentor isn't threatened by a strong mentee but
is empowered.

Similarly in assisting teachers to depict their
growing undestandings of research mentoring...  When I
looked at Donna's image of the gargoyle
http://www.cfkeep.org/html/snapshot.php?id=51952540922866
I saw a metaphor for being scared and yet excited (is
that what you see too?)
Donna's chosen image offered me the chance to draw out
more insight into how she was feeling as a new
research mentor studying for an MA.

Thinking about questions posed by Matthias for uus on
the list today:

"how are students invited into the action research
process and how do they begin to problematize human
relationships in the classroom or at school with a
view to transforming them?"

I use metaphor for assisting new teacher researchers
to communicate how they 'see' themselves as teachers
and there may be potential for helping them identify
new possible selves that they'd wish to embody using
photographic or computer generated image.  What do you
thnk?

Warm regards,

Sarah



Sarah Fletcher
http://www.TeacherResearch.net <http://www.teacherresearch.net/> 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
November 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
October 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
November 2004
September 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager