Gabriel BODARD wrote:
> A sample entry might look something like:
>
> • Classical pedigree/qualifications (e.g. PhD)
> • Computing qualifications/experience (e.g. XML/XSLT; programming
> language(s); ...)
> • Projects associated with/responsible for?
> • Referee (1/2 classicist and/or digital humanist who can vouch for you)
I disagree with the idea of publishing names/addresses of
referees/references...even with a full online CV. "Referees available
on request" seems much better to me. ;-)
> (b) coordinate this with the medievalist/other humanist bodies who have
> similar problems. After all, it is probably the case that someone with a
> humanities background outside of classics is still better qualified for
> this kind of work than a compsci major, however good their programming
> skills.
Yes, I mean if you need someone with Classical Latin, then if no
classicists have the requisite skills, a medievalist who started
learning Classical Latin before moving on to medieval, would be better
than nothing. Perhaps this is something which should be done at a
digital humanities level?
-James
--
Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford
|