JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Archives


CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Archives

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Archives


CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Home

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Home

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES  October 2006

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES October 2006

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: 250m from Landfill

From:

"Chattwood, Malcolm" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Chattwood, Malcolm

Date:

Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:08:48 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (356 lines)

Sorry for throwing another variable into the pot but coal gas has been
mentioned. Should 250m or other appropriate VERTICAL distance to old
coal workings be considered? Coal workings are often mentioned in
subsidence terms but do those authorities unlucky enough to have shallow
workings in potential development areas take them into account from the
mines gas aspect?  The size of gas reservoir in such areas available to
leak out to surface, particularly under conditions of sharply falling
barometer could be potentially huge & dwarf the amount available in a
landfill site.

Regards

-------------------------------------------------
Malcolm Chattwood
Environmental Protection Officer
Argyll & Bute Council
Kilmory
Lochgilphead
Argyll
PA31 8RT
01546 604421
------------------------------------------------


          

-----Original Message-----
From: Contaminated Land Management Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Paul
Pearse
Sent: 25 October 2006 13:57
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: 250m from Landfill

Robin

Is there a copy of the DoE investigation anywhere?

Paul Pearse
Environmental Control Officer
Planning, Protection & Licensing Colchester Borough Council PO Box 889,
Town Hall Colchester CO1 1FL
Tel: 01206 282592
Fx: 01206 282598
 
Help Protect the Environment. Only Print out this email if it is
absolutely necessary.
Any opinions expressed are not necessarily those of Colchester Borough
Council and or Colchester Borough Homes. This e-mail and any
attachments, replies and forwarded copies are confidential and are
strictly for the use of named recipient(s) only. If you have received it
in error you may not make use of it. Please e-mail us, including a copy
of the message, to [log in to unmask] Then delete the e-mail
and any copies.
 
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Contaminated Land Management Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Robin
MacKenzie
Sent: 25 October 2006 11:13
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: 250m from Landfill

The history for the 250mtr rule was after an incident at Loscoe where a
house blew up and it was suspected that it was a huge barometric drop in
pressure which allowed the methane emanating from a source to travel
very quickly up a permeable gravel layer into a property although the
geological circumstances are far more complex. After the accident
investigation, the DoE wrote to every Council in the land and asked them
for all the properties within 250mtr of landfills within their areas.
Hence the 250mtr was taken as a literal safe boundary for development
and protection of buildings.

As I recall there was a contention regarding the source of the methane
as there were two potential sources, Landfill Gas and Natural methane,
Coal Gas.

Here is a link to some authoritative history on the incident:

http://www.kabrna.com/cpgs/programme/events_01_02.htm#Derbyshire%20Disas
ters


Regards,

Robin Mackenzie

-----Original Message-----
From: Contaminated Land Management Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Drake,
Jason
Sent: 25 October 2006 10:18
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: 250m from Landfill

... and on the flip side of what Ben has noted, there are plenty of
sites where gas is not migrating at all.

Absolutely agree with Ben about RA, CSM, SI etc - I think the "250m
theory" is one of the most misunderstood / abused in con land.

By the way - Ben, do you have a reference to the EA's 50m
recommendation?

Jason.

Jason Drake, City of York Council.


-----Original Message-----
From: Contaminated Land Management Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Ben
Crowther
Sent: 25 October 2006 09:42
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: 250m from Landfill


EA recomend no development within 50 metres, but I'm aware of gas
migrating a mile or so - ICI Ellesmere port I think - not methane but...
in a former sandy transmissable river bed, Its all down to Risk
Assessment, conceptual models, SI and a lump of luck? (generally bad...)

By the way, anyone go to the CIRIA workshop on landfill gas analysis in
Glasgow last week?,  Can I get a copy of the notes or (and this is to
the Former MAPAC Girls and Boys) did you finialise a landfill gas risk
assessment proocedure for everyone to benifit from?

Cheers


Ben 'cat-amongst-the pidgeons' Crowther.

Ben Crowther
Pollution Control Officer
Environmental Health Services
Calderdale MBC
Northgate House
Northgate

Halifax
West Yorkshire
HX1 1UN

Tel: 01422 392316

e-mail: [log in to unmask]


Warning

Please note that whilst this e-mail and any attachments originate from
Calderdale MBC, the views expressed may not necessarily represent the
views of Calderdale MBC.


This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is
privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure.  They
must not be used by, or copied or disclosed to persons other than the
intended recipient.  Any liability (in negligence or otherwise) arising
from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on any
information contained in this e-mail is excluded. If you have received
this e-mail in error please inform the sender and delete the e-mail.


E-mail can never be 100% secure. Please bear this in mind and carry out
such virus and other checks, as you consider appropriate.  Calderdale
MBC accepts no responsibility in this regard.

Copyright of this e-mail and any attachments belongs to Calderdale MBC.

Should you communicate with anyone at Calderdale MBC by e-mail, you
consent to the Council monitoring and reading any such correspondence.



>>> Paul Pearse <[log in to unmask]> 23/10/2006 14:31 >>>
Dear all


Seeing that the "250m from a landfill" is an arbitrary and outdated
concept, I would like to know what people condition about LFG put when
commenting on planning apps nowadays?


Cheers!


Paul Pearse
Environmental Control Officer
Planning, Protection & Licensing Colchester Borough Council PO Box 889,
Town Hall Colchester CO1 1FL
Tel: 01206 282592
Fx: 01206 282598


Help Protect the Environment. Only Print out this email if it is
absolutely necessary.
Any opinions expressed are not necessarily those of Colchester Borough
Council and or Colchester Borough Homes. This e-mail and any
attachments, replies and forwarded copies are confidential and are
strictly for the use of named recipient(s) only. If you have received it
in error you may not make use of it. Please e-mail us, including a copy
of the message, to [log in to unmask]

<mailto:[log in to unmask]> . Then delete the e-mail and any
copies.








Any opinions expressed are not necessarily those of Colchester Borough
Council and or Colchester Borough Homes. This e-mail and any
attachments, replies and forwarded copies are confidential and are
strictly for the use of named recipient(s) only. If you have received it
in error you are prohibited from distributing, copying, making use of or
unlawful use of, any information in it.  Please e-mail us, including a
copy of the message, to [log in to unmask] Then delete the
e-mail and any copies.


Internet email may be susceptible to data corruption, interception and
unauthorised amendment for which Colchester Borough Council and
Colchester Borough Homes does not accept liability. Neither is liability
accepted for any losses caused as a result of computer viruses.

########################################################################
#############
This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared

by MailMarshal, the Council's Content Scanner
########################################################################
#############

########################################################################
##############

Warning

Please note that whilst this e-mail and any attachments originate from
Calderdale MBC,

the views expressed may not necessarily represent the views of
Calderdale MBC.


This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is
privileged,

confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. 

They must not be used by, or copied or disclosed to persons other than
the intended recipient. 

Any liability (in negligence or otherwise) arising from any third party
acting, or refraining from acting,

on any information contained in this e-mail is excluded.

If you have received this e-mail in error please inform the sender and
delete the e-mail.


E-mail can never be 100{ secure.}Please bear this in mind and carry out
such virus and other checks, as you consider appropriate. 

Calderdale MBC accepts no responsibility in this regard.

Copyright of this e-mail and any attachments belongs to Calderdale MBC.

Should you communicate with anyone at Calderdale MBC by e-mail, you
consent to the

Council monitoring and reading any such correspondence.


########################################################################
##############

* * * * * * * * * * * *

This communication is from City of York Council.

The information contained within, and in any attachment(s), is
confidential and legally privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the
intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), please
note that any form of distribution, copying or use of this
communication, or the information within, is strictly prohibited and may
be unlawful. Equally, you must not disclose all, or part, of its
contents to any other person.

If you have received this communication in error, please return it
immediately to the sender, then delete and destroy any copies of it.

City of York Council disclaims any liability for action taken in
reliance on the content of this communication.



The information in this email is solely for the intended recipients. 
If you are not an intended recipient, you must not disclose, copy, or
distribute its contents or use them in any way: please advise the sender
immediately and delete this email.

Perth & Kinross Council does not warrant that this email or any
attachments are virus-free and does not accept any liability for any
loss or damage resulting from any virus infection. Perth & Kinross
Council may monitor or examine any emails received by its email system.

The information contained in this email may not be the views of Perth &
Kinross Council. It is possible for email to be falsified and the sender
cannot be held responsible for the integrity of the information
contained in it.

Requests to Perth & Kinross Council under the Freedom of Information
(Scotland) Act should be directed to the Freedom of Information Team -
 
email: [log in to unmask]



Any opinions expressed are not necessarily those of Colchester Borough
Council and or Colchester Borough Homes. This e-mail and any
attachments, replies and forwarded copies are confidential and are
strictly for the use of named recipient(s) only. If you have received it
in error you are prohibited from distributing, copying, making use of or
unlawful use of, any information in it.  Please e-mail us, including a
copy of the message, to [log in to unmask] Then delete the
e-mail and any copies. 



Internet email may be susceptible to data corruption, interception and
unauthorised amendment for which Colchester Borough Council and
Colchester Borough Homes does not accept liability. Neither is liability
accepted for any losses caused as a result of computer viruses.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. 

In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender - [log in to unmask] - by reply email. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Argyll and Bute Council shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

All communications sent to or from Argyll and Bute Council may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. 

This email has been scanned for viruses, vandals and malicious content.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
November 1999
July 1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager