Hi,
I think this is something I wanted to bring up myself. And I'm sure
experiments as well will get on board on this as their users are surely
more affected by this inflexibility than we are.
IMO the best way, or at least the one I would follow, is to raise the
issue at the ops meeting and then if necessary at the TCG. The advantage
of going through the ops meeting before is that if they can do something
they will if not the TCG is more open to hear issues if they were
previously discussed in a wider forum and a summary is presented.
The next TCG is on the 20th and the next ops meeting (leaving out today)
is on the 18th. How many people are interested in writing down their
opinion about the issue?
thanks
cheers
alessandra
Burke, S (Stephen) wrote:
> Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stephen Childs said:
>> To step back a bit, I find it depressing that no-one in JRA1
>> seems to be
>> thinking about these real-world issues: it applies across the
>> board from
>> MPI support to passing batch systems requirements to short
>> jobs etc. etc.
>> Is there anything we can do to improve this?
>
> Formally, the answer is to take it to the TCG - Alessandra Forti is a
> member. Maybe she can comment on how effective it's likely to be ...
>
> http://egee-intranet.web.cern.ch/egee-intranet/NA1/TCG/tcg.htm
>
> Stephen
--
*******************************************
* Dr Alessandra Forti *
* Technical Coordinator - NorthGrid Tier2 *
* http://www.hep.man.ac.uk/u/aforti *
*******************************************
|