This is the kind of divisive, ill-informed medical model twaddle you might
expect from an unaccountable organisation like "Guide Dogs for THE BLIND"
(my emphasis). Who are "the blind" by the way?
I wonder if, instead of asking 'guide dogs' (see original posting) they
might have done better to talk to their owners! Dangerous scaremongering at
its very worst.
No suggestions (I notice) in this sensationalised tripe about the many
solutions that exist to ensure safety for both ambulatory impaired
pedestrians and visually impaired people. If the proper (social model)
consultation is done (which is all too infrequently the case sad to say) or
good practice from other local authorities is followed, multi-surfacing
which is suitable for everyone can be employed to ensure both safety and
ease of travel.
Another blindingly obvious free idea to pass on to 'Guide Dogs' (or perhaps
not!).
Best Wishes,
Mike Higgins,
Email [log in to unmask]
(in a personal capacity)
________________End of message______________________
This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies). Enquiries about the list administratione should be sent to [log in to unmask]
Archives and tools are located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
|