tis 2006-09-12 klockan 17:10 +0100 skrev Pete Johnston:
> Hi Ann,
[*huge* snip]
> So really I guess we need to decide whether we want an XML format that
> supports the full DCAM description model, or whether we want an XML
> format that supports some subset of it (and if so what subset), or
> whether we want both.
I think the comments we are getting on dc-xml strongly hint towards
adding a dc-xml-minimal that is essentially similar to the current
"Simple DC in RDF/XML" but with the RDF part removed and DCAM compliance
added.
/Mikael
--
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
|