Hmm. This could be harder than you think. The undisciplined lot on this list do not always use
'snap' in the Subject line, and comments as in Re: Snap or Fw: Snap would be hard to filter out.
Best of luck though, and it would deal with the backlog too.
Roger Collett
Arrowhead Press
http://www.arrowheadpress.co.uk/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Imagination is the one weapon in the war against reality."
Jules de Gaultier
----- Original Message -----
From: "Knut Mork Skagen" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: Urgent! Archiving your current snap.
> On 9/20/06, sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> since I can't find it, could you brief me on "Knut's cunning plan"?
>
> Well, it's hardly _that_ cunning....
>
> I just suggested to Randolph we write a script which can run through
> the PoetryEtc archives and automatically cull out snapshots. Then it
> could either run once a week and pick up new snapshots, or sit
> somewhere and receive e-mails so snaps are added to the collection on
> the fly (though the latter is harder to do).
>
> The question would, of course, be what to do with them when they're
> picked up. A blog kind of structure certainly seems sensible. And a
> script could easily submit them into a blog for further treatment.
>
> --Knut
> --
> This email has been verified as Virus free
> Virus Protection and more available at http://www.plus.net
>
|