The Disability-Research Discussion List

Managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds

Help for DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH  September 2006

DISABILITY-RESEARCH September 2006

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

PUBLIC INQUIRY INTO 7/7 AFTER 911 REVELATIONS

From:

Colin REvell <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Colin REvell <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:10:39 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (130 lines)

PUBLIC INQUIRY INTO 7/7 AFTER 911 REVELATIONS

You are free to distribute this story!!!

Following revelations from the US that the neo-cons orchestrated the attacks 
for 911 as an excuse for its raft of invasions in the US. I also have lots 
of questions about 7/7. What has happened about a proper enquiry? Why were a 
group of Israeli's told not to come to a meeting in Liverpool St on the 
morning of the bombs as reported in the Evening Standard but not followed 
up? Why was the police getting its information from the media and working 
out its response accordingly? If Tony Blair is so closely allied to George 
Bush and thinks nothing of innocent people dying in Iraq and Lebanon, why 
not here? What were security people doing working out what to do if a bomb 
was on the tube only weeks earlier. For the US story, see the following:


http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/09/350097.html?c=on#comments

9/11 INSIDE JOB,

75 leading professors and scientists in the US say there is now evidence 
that 9/11 was perpetrated by the Whitehouse to justify invasions in the 
Middle East according to a Daily Mail report, yes I know shocking, the Hate 
Mail publishing anything but it is on the net so not sure if it is in their 
disgusing hate filled, neo-nazi sympathetic rag.. Fury as academics claim 
9/11 was 'inside job' ... could be news as the only Hate Mail story worth 
repeating ever!!! i am getting ideas from moron press ... i don't even get 
paid to think like this ...

....06.09.2006 12:46
So the UK is catching up with the rest of Europe and the US in terms of the 
media coverage of 9/11 truth...

In additon to the Hate Mail article the Guardian ran this yesterday:

Who really blew up the twin towers?
As the fifth anniversary of 9/11 nears, Christina Asquith finds academics 
querying the official version of events
Tuesday September 5, 2006
http://education.guardian.co.uk/egweekly/story/0,,1864524,00.html

And some local rags are reporting on local truth campaigns:

'OFFICIAL 9/11 STORY CHALLENGED
A GROUP of Sussex people – concerned at 'anomalies' surrounding the official 
story of the terror attacks of September 11, 2001 – have invited the 
chairman of the Britain and Ireland 9/11 Truth Campaign to give a 
presentation at All Saints, Lewes, on Tuesday, September 5.
http://www.seafordtoday.co.uk/ViewArticle2.aspx?SectionID=509&ArticleID=1741597

And David Ray Griffin is on Heaven and Earth on BBC1 Sunday 10:00am - 
11:00am to, no doubt, talk about his book, "Christian Faith and the Truth 
Behind 9/11" that has been rejected by Amazon in the US
http://www.911blogger.com/node/2479

Though it is available in the UK:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Christian-Faith-Truth-Behind-Reflection/dp/0664231179/

shadowplay
Have a nice day...

06.09.2006 17:36

Evidentially true?
Evidentially true?
The 'scholars for truth' have been confusing people with the 'explosives in 
towers'/'wtc 7 pulled'/'missile hit the pentagon' rubbish for far too long. 
Their speculation is very damaging, albeit not as harmful as the speculation 
that 'Osama did it'.
The real scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology 
(NIST) have almost all the answers:

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

The earlier full report is up there too -  http://wtc.nist.gov - however, 
the FAQ tells you all you need to know when it comes to debunking the idle 
'scholars' speculation. That said, the NIST reports do not answer the 
question regarding whom it was that was piloting those planes. Note that 
757/767's are not 'fly by wire', and that it was 757/767 planes that were 
hijacked that day, not 777's or Airbus, i.e. 'fly by wire' planes.

Here are a few statements of fact regarding that day:

9/11 was the opening day of the DSEi arms-trade fair in London's Docklands.

The first people to speculate that it was 'the bloke in a cave' worked for 
Jane's Information Group - the same company that promoted that arms-trade 
fair.

When it comes to showing some care and consideration for all those that had 
their lives ruined or lost on that day, you might want to ask whom it really 
was that sabotaged the Pentagon (arms) and pulled down the World Trade 
Centre (trade), on that very opening day of that arms-trade fair. You might 
also want to wonder why it was that the 'aviation experts' from Jane's 
Information Group failed to mention threats made in advance by the small, 
'insurrectionary' group 'disarm-DSEi' to disarm the arms-traders on that 
very day.

Thankyou.

Fred West
Insider Trading

07.09.2006 16:49
Many companies benefited from the 9/11 "attack". One company, an armstrader 
named Raytheon, saw its stock saw immediately after the attack. One of their 
best customers is the CIA . For further details visit 
www.911research.wtc7.net/sept11/stockputs.html

MATT BLACK
Alternative 9/11 film

07.09.2006 16:56
For those of you who've not yet seen it, heres an interesting film regarding 
the 9/11 "attack".  http://www.loosechange911.com/

Matt Black
911 and Blair

_________________________________________________________________
The new Windows Live Toolbar helps you guard against viruses 
http://toolbar.live.com/?mkt=en-gb

________________End of message______________________
This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies). Enquiries about the list administratione should be sent to [log in to unmask]
Archives and tools are located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager