Dear All,
The UK & Irl Branch of the International Association of Music Libraries
has sent a detailed consultation response to the Gowers Rview.
It is available on the website at www.iaml-uk-irl.org/ (follow the link
to news then press releases and consultation responses).
Hope this is of any help.
Best wishes,
Almut
--
Ms Almut Boehme
Head of Music
National Library of Scotland
George IV Bridge
Edinburgh
EH1 1EW
Scotland
UK
Tel. +44 (0)131 623 3880
Fax. +44 (0)131 623 3701
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
WWW: www.nls.uk/collections/music/index.html
-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion list for British & Irish Sound Archives
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Prentice, Will
Sent: 02 August 2006 11:05
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: FW: Extension of copyright on sound recordings
The message below is forwarded to the list at the request of the sender,
who is not a member. Feel free to discuss/respond directly to the list;
I'll pass all responses to the sender.
Will Prentice
-----Original Message-----
From: Cook Nicholas [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 11 July 2006 10:30
To: Prentice, Will
Subject: Extension of copyright on sound recordings
Dear Will Prentice
I'm writing at the suggestion of Daniel Leech-Wilkinson, but in my roles
as Director of the AHRC Research Centre for the History and Analysis of
Recorded Music (CHARM) and also a member of the British Academy Review
Group on Copyright and Humanities Scholarship. Wearing both these hats
I'm concerned about the campaign to extend copyright on sound
recordings, which--on US experience--would both limit public access to
the musical heritage and undermine the reissue industry that curently
enables that access. CHARM made a submission to the Gowers Review which
made both of these, and other, points (if you'd like to see it, our
submission is at
http://www.charm.rhul.ac.uk/content/resources/Gowers.pdf.)
A number of submissions to the Gowers Review have opposed this extension
on grounds of public access, which presents the issue as one of
commercial versus non-commercial interests. However there is a view that
what might be more effective in influencing Gowers' thinking is a clear
statement that, in favouring the commercial interests of the major
record companies, such an extension would damage other sectors of the
market, in particular the reissue industry. And given the publicity that
the BPI compaign has attracted through the contributions of
superannuated pop stars--such as Ian Anderson's article in the
_Financial Times_--I'm concerned that the position of the reissue
industry is heard loud and clear.
I was wondering how far British & Irish Sound Archives has been involved
in these issues, or whether you may know how far the position of the
reissue industry has been represented to Gowers--in particular, do you
know if is there any kind of industry organization which may have been
pressing the case? (I don't see anything in the Open Rights Group's list
of submissions at
http://www.openrightsgroup.org/orgwiki/index.php/Gowers_review_on_intell
ectual_property, but I'm sure that's not complete.) Although the
deadline for submission to Gowers has passed, the British Academy's
review group will be making its report and holding a high-profile launch
ahead of the planned date for Gowers to report, so that will be an
opportunity to further press the case. Any help you might be able to
give me would be very much appreciated.
Best wishes, Nicholas Cook
-------------------
Nicholas Cook, FBA
Professorial Research Fellow in Music
Royal Holloway, University of London
Director, AHRC Research Centre for the History and Analysis of Recorded
Music
[log in to unmask]
************************************************************************
**
Experience the British Library online at www.bl.uk
Help the British Library conserve the world's knowledge. Adopt a Book.
www.bl.uk/adoptabook
The Library's St Pancras site is WiFi - enabled
************************************************************************
*
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are
not the intended recipient, please delete this e-mail and notify the
[log in to unmask] : The contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed or
copied without the sender's consent.
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the
author and do not necessarily reflect those of the British Library. The
British Library does not take any responsibility for the views of the
author.
************************************************************************
*
*******************************************************************
Visit the National Library of Scotland online at www.nls.uk
*******************************************************************
This communication is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you
are not the intended recipient, please notify the ICT Helpdesk on
+44 131 623 3700 or [log in to unmask] and delete this e-mail. The
statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the
author and do not necessarily reflect those of the National Library of
Scotland. This message is subject to the Data Protection Act 1998
and Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 and has been
scanned by MessageLabs.
*******************************************************************
|