I'm unsure what you're asking. The text explicitly presents itself as a
key, culmination, and at the same time easy summary of the whole Occult
Philosophy. Is that your question?
Chris Lehrich
Mandrake of Oxford wrote:
> Dear Friend
>
> very informative -
> was my impression too although i've only a passing acquantance with this
> kind of material. I thought the fact that it was a 'fourth' book also marks
> it out as more heterodox or written by others as a completion of a project?
> Do you think there's anything in that - so like a putative fourth chapter of
> the Book of the Law, fourth of the Hindu Veda's etc.
>
> bb/93
>
> mogg
>
>
--
Christopher I. Lehrich
Boston University
|