Rasmus Fogh wrote:
> Dear Patrick,
>
> In the current system what you propose is not possible. Over the next
> months we are upgrading the underlying code machinery, and it will then be
> easily possible to have different files for local and standard data.
>
> Meanwhile, if you are interested, you could send us your custom prototypes
> with an explanation, so we could consider addnig them to the standard set?
>
Well, I think the new prototypes will largely suffice for now, and the
other types are not quite complete. Part of the reason I asked the
question is that it will probably require some testing (not all of the
documentation on the prototypes is entirely clear to me), and that is a
bit awkward if it interferes with the general operation of the program
(i.e. all project would/might be affected) and updates are every once in
a while erasing the current customization.
Patrick
|