On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 01:00:31PM +0100 or thereabouts, Alessandra Forti wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> mmhh I don't understand what you say.
>
> what is happening is that it is publishing _all_ the end points. I have
> nothing against publishing that the protocol is enabled locally which is
> what we have done up to now. But I don't want to publish all the end points.
Give me an example of something being published that should not be?
Steve
>
> cheers
> alessandra
>
> Steve Traylen wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:43:53PM +0100 or thereabouts, Alessandra Forti
> >wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>the new YAIM writes all the access protocol in the Info System. Is there
> >>any reason for this? Most of them are opened for intra-node use.
> >
> >Which are the extra ones, dcap, gsidcap? If so these should be publised
> >for people internal. The fact that the protocol is not available offsite
> >is a property of the protocol and people should be aware.
> >
> >What else does it publish?
> >>If there is no compelling reason I'd like to avoid to publish them all
> >>and publish only the gridftp and srm ones which are the only one for the
> >>external world. Is it possible?
> >>
> >>thanks
> >>
> >>cheers
> >>alessandra
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>*******************************************
> >>* Dr Alessandra Forti *
> >>* Technical Coordinator - NorthGrid Tier2 *
> >>* http://www.hep.man.ac.uk/u/aforti *
> >>*******************************************
> >
>
> --
> *******************************************
> * Dr Alessandra Forti *
> * Technical Coordinator - NorthGrid Tier2 *
> * http://www.hep.man.ac.uk/u/aforti *
> *******************************************
--
Steve Traylen
work email: [log in to unmask]
personal email: [log in to unmask]
jabber: xmpp:[log in to unmask]
|