Katharine Schopflin wrote:
> The sad thing about that is that for many of the people on this list -
> whether CILIP members or not - it may be the most interacting they do
> with CILIP. It's true we can be a vibrant online community without being
> called LIS-CILIP, but it does feel like another example of information
> professionals developing their own communities which have nothing to do
> with their lead body.
You know, when thinking of CILIP as a 'lead body' I would have to ask how
that is pronounced :-)
But in any case, there is no need to change the name of the list: it is
*about* CILIP, not *for* CILIP.
John Briggs
|