Frances Hendrix wrote:
> Did any one mention that we would need to see that membership of both,
> during the 'trial' period, was of ordinary members and not council
> members, officials etc. What I am saying is we want to see like for
> like?
Good point! I and several others, I am sure, will keep an eye on this.
> Ps it would have been good if Cilip had communicated this to the list
> themselves?
Indeed. But I am of the opinion that it is those of us who are elected
who should be feeding back such information. I have been "elsewhere
occupied" on dosh earning activities and I know that Chris Armstrong is
not available this week, otherwise both of us would have responded
earlier. But in retrospect I, as a councillor, could/should have
reported the result to this list immediately after the event. It has
started me thinking seriously about how all of us (councillors) should
be reporting back to the membership and our constituencies. How else do
we persuade members to become involved?
Karen
--
Karen Blakeman, CILIP UKeiG Councillor
88 Star Road, Caversham, Berks RG4 5BE, UK
t: +44 118 947 2256 m: +44 7764 936733 f: +44 20 8020 0253
Mailto:[log in to unmask], Web - http://www.rba.co.uk/
|