> So do we really need all the fancy coordinate handling that LINPLOT
> provides?
There's already a SPECX routine. I thought that part of the motivation
for CLINPLOT was to be rigorous about the WCS. According to Tim's Mac
profiling the bulk of the time was going in AST.
Is there any graphics issue, like the slowness DISPLAY now exhibits?
> LINPLOT is a bit of a giant in terms of its functionality. I can't help
> thinking that if we want CLINPLOT to go fast we should avoid re-using
> LINPLOT code, and produce code designed for speed and minimal
> functionality.
It's certainly worth rewiewing what are the essential features...
Malcolm
|