Malcolm J. Currie wrote:
> It's a shame that the value for PPARC's and SERC's money wasn't
> appreciated.
My apologies if this question has been asked before or if this is not
the right place to ask about this, but I'd like to know whether the
decision taken by the Science Committee was final in this respect? I'm
not aware of what the regular procedures of the Science Committee are,
but I imagine that this decision might be revised in the future if there
is enough interest from the astronomical community. Of course there
might be practical problems to reactivate the project if this
(hypothetical) revision takes place too far in the future.
Cheers,
--
Eduardo Unda-Sanzana - [log in to unmask]
Research (in English): http://eduardo.almagesto.org/research
Personal (in Spanish): http://eduardo.almagesto.org
"Solamente lo barato se compra con el dinero" (A. Cortez)
|