I have now added some figures and examples to the draft.
Thanks for the suggestions regarding syntax to use in the examples.
After some thought, I decided to go with RDF/XML, mostly because it it
most easily imported directly into tools, such as the W3C RDF Validator
service.
However, I'm still open to arguments that we should include
graph/N-TRIPLES/... versions as well.
Please consider the pictures and examples and provide suggestions for
improvements/additions.
I've chosen to not illustrate every section, instead relying on a few
carefully (?) chosen diagrams that illustrate the more difficult parts.
Does this work or not?
/Mikael
tis 2006-05-02 klockan 19:31 +0200 skrev Mikael Nilsson:
> Hi!
>
> This is to pre-announce a first HTML draft of the new DC-in-RDF
> recommendation.
>
> http://kmr.nada.kth.se/~mini/dc-rdf.html
>
> I will next be working on filling this with some pictures and a few
> simple examples.
>
> Any comments on the text itself, however, can be raised at this point.
>
> /Mikael
|