JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MINING-HISTORY Archives


MINING-HISTORY Archives

MINING-HISTORY Archives


mining-history@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MINING-HISTORY Home

MINING-HISTORY Home

MINING-HISTORY  April 2006

MINING-HISTORY April 2006

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: History of the name "bell pit"?

From:

David Williams <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

The mining-history list.

Date:

Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:23:10 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (57 lines)

In message <018a01c66658$76662a40$83fefea9@oemcomputer>, Sallie Bassham 
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>Today I was asked when the name "bell pit" was first used? Since I
>don't know, I'm asking the list.
>I was further asked if Raistrick was the first to use the term.
>I am well aware of opinions about not using the term "bell pit" at
>all, or inappropriately (hence the quote marks) - so please go easy on
>repeating these!  However, has the term "bell pit" come into use
>because of the supposed shape underground or because the surface shape
>resembles an inverted bell - or both? or neither?
>Sallie Bassham


To possibly get the ball rolling - Lynn Willies in his article 
"Ironstone Mining in Derbyshire" Mining History 13:4 quotes Pilkington 
"View of the present State of Derbyshire" (1782)

"When ... it is seen on the surface.. It is taken out of the ground to a 
depth of eighteen or twenty yards. For this purpose a hole is made about 
the same size with the shaft of a coal pit. This is generally enlarged 
every way, as they go deeper into the earth, and at length assumes the 
shape of a bell. It is usual not to go lower than eighteen yards. Fresh 
ground is then broken and another hole of the same form and depth is 
begun and sunk in the earth .... soil near the surface is intermixed 
with the lower beds and rendered entirely useless ... and (land) 
receives greater injury from working mines of ironstone than with those 
of coal"

Lynn then quotes Farey (1811)

"A round pit of the usual size of a shaft is sunk, until the ironstone 
is reached, from three to ten yards deep, the first two or three yards 
being made cylindrical, and the part below it conical, in order to reach 
a larger surface of the stone, which being got below the shaft, and a 
drain laid across it for connecting with the next pit, the Workmen or 
Ironstone-men, begin to hollow out the Measures all round the shaft into 
the form of a bell (hence the name), throwing the refuse into the 
centre, and getting the ironstone as far as possible at all sides; which 
done the pit is abandoned, and another begun at a proper distance, the 
soil from which is tumbled into the last pit, until the stone is reached 
and got as before, when another pit is begun and so on; and this method 
of Bell-pits still continues to be used, unless when the depth becomes 
very considerable, or a hard Measure lays above the Ironstone, which may 
serve as a roof in Thurling for it, or working it in short banks as coal 
is wrought ... which should always be done where practicable in order to 
avoid the waste of ironstone in the angles or Buckles as they are called 
between each four adjacent pits."

As Lynn points out in the article, Farey obviously regarded Bell-Pits as 
a very old method of mining.

Hope this helps.

Dave Williams
-- 
David Williams

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
October 2022
September 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager