Hello,
Tim can comment on "link sequential spinsystems" better than me. In
general Tkinter is a bit of a pain with geometry (in particular
re-sizing). We've tried varying tactics which is no doubt why we're
getting slightly differing re-sizing behaviours in different modules, that
could be made more uniform with a bit of effort. The multiple tables
effect is because of the way the weighting has been set up, again that
could be gone through again to try to get better behaviour. Once upon a
time I thought about adding a drag bar but it was a real struggle trying
to convince Tk to do what it was told. Originally it was for strips,
because I thought perhaps we wanted differing widths, but I gave up after
Tk just seemed to do what it wanted and not what it was told, giving
fairly random behaviour (and certainly not usable). But since then Tim
has done better with specifying geometry so perhaps time to look at that
again as well.
Wayne
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Stephen Paisey wrote:
> Dear Developers
> I very much like the "link sequential spinsystems" function and find it very
> useful, however the popup window is very big in its full form and i like to
> shrink it to about half its full width. When i do this most of the window
> scales well but the the buttons in the "matched peaks" section remain the
> same size and the end ones are cut off. It would be nice if they could scale
> as well (and the "Close" and "help" buttons at the bottom)
> Also i have noticed when vertically re-sizing any of the popup windows with
> multiple tables in, some tables shrink while others obstinateley stay the
> same size. I don't know how difficult it would be to do this but what would
> be nice is if there was a drag bar between the sections of popup windows so
> that they could be independently sizeable (vertically) within the pop up window.
> Also one final point about the "link sequential spinsystems" function i
> don't know how other users feel but the way i use it i would prefer to have
> the "query spin system" displayed in first strip of the destination window
> (perhaps even with a bolder frame or something) as opposed to in a seperate
> window (setting the query window to the same as the destination window
> doesn't achieve this effect) as this would cut down on fiddling when
> zooming and toggling between spectra.
> Many thanks
> Stephen
>
|