Chris, my apologies for giving the impression that the idle fingers
I was referring to were yours: I meant the idle fingers of the 85%
non-self-archivers, but I should have been more careful about the
possibility of another interpretation.
"A Keystroke Koan for our Open Access Times"
http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/11125/
"Keystroke Economy: A Study of the Time and Effort
Involved in Self-Archiving"
http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/10688/
"Keystroke strategy for open access "
http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/news/story/0,9830,1427682,00.html
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Temp/berlin3-harnad.ppt
When spends one's earthly hours saying the same thing over and over
again, as your faithful archivangelist alas often does, one wrongly
assumes sometimes that others find it as familiar as one does oneself.
No put-down intended. Please forgive me.
Stevan
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Chris Armstrong wrote:
> Rest assured - these 'idle fingers' have been depositing research
> articles.
>
> But
>
> although you choose - as usual - to respond with a 'put down', these are
> real problems that will soon, if not now, demand a real response.
>
> ______________________________
> Chris Armstrong
> Information Automation Limited
> t. (+44) 1974 251302
> e. [log in to unmask]
> w. www.i-a-l.co.uk
> b: http://i-a-l.blogspot.com/
>
|