JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Archives


CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Archives

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Archives


CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Home

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Home

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES  March 2006

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES March 2006

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Development on agricultural land

From:

"Brown, Neil" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Brown, Neil

Date:

Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:11:23 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (206 lines)

Thanks to everyone who has responded to this. It appears the way forward may
be to develop a questionnaire which can be sent out to developers planning
on agricultural land. Many of those of you who responded used this method to
determine more specific previous use. Obviously there is the possibility a
developer will just tick 'No' for every question, so a site visit afterwards
may be a good idea. If the questionnaire or site visit lead to a suspicion
of risk then a more detailed desk survey will likely be insisted on.

Thanks again,

Neil

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Jonathan Parr [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent:	29 March 2006 08:18
> To:	[log in to unmask]
> Subject:	Re: Development on agricultural land
> 
> I agree with Neil.
> 
> I have been looking at natural contamination, and one thig I have noted
> formt he BGS Geochemical Atlas is that areas of agricultural land were
> heavily contaminated with heavy metals for no apparent reason.  It
> transpires that waste was ploughed into the topsoil as some sort of ground
> conditioner or improver (!).  Also, don't forget that sewage sludge waste
> is still put onto agricultural land.  
> 
> If the development is going to be a house or a school (or some other
> situation where lots of lovely little critical receptors may be) then a
> DTS should be undertaken; and possibly limited sampling.  Remember; it is
> the DEVELOPER who has to prove the site is "Safe for Use", not the LA!
> 
> See attached article for more on the first paragraph (sorry for the
> highlighting!)
> 
> Jon
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Contaminated Land Management Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Neil
> Parry
> Sent: 27 March 2006 09:50
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Development on agricultural land
> 
> 
> Neil/Michael
> 
> In my experience agricultural land may be just as contaminated as
> industrial due to the possibility of unmanaged landfilling operations.
> Prior to 1974 agricultural land was often used for landfill,
> particularly where "landscaping" was required to provide more level
> fields etc.
> 
> As I have come across an unlisted site that had items such as fridges,
> cars and domestic waste buried beneath what appeared to be "Greenfield"
> I would urge caution when approaching such sites.
> 
> As with all development sites a good Phase 1 desk study is generally
> required.
> 
> Neil Parry
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Contaminated Land Management Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Moore,
> Michael
> Sent: 27 March 2006 09:10
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Development on agricultural land
> 
> Neil,
> 
> I believe there is a CLAN note that says generally speaking agricultural
> land should not be considered as potentially contaminated unless you
> have good reason that it could be e.g. pesticide use/storage, lead shot
> from shooting scattered around a field.
> 
> Generally speaking we deal with such applications on a case by case
> basis, if the application was situated on farm buildings we probably
> would put a requirement on because there is a possibility the buildings
> used for storage of fuels, fertilisers etc, if open fields probably not,
> but maybe it is worth giving PPS23 a close read on this one to make sure
> any policy you develop is in line with this.
> 
> Hope this helps
> 
> Michael Moore
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Contaminated Land Management Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Brown,
> Neil
> Sent: 24 March 2006 15:00
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Development on agricultural land
> 
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> We are receiving an increasing number of planning applications for
> conversion of farmland/steadings into residential developments with
> gardens. None of these sites are being flagged up by our PartIIA
> computer model as requiring further investigation, as clearly in their
> current use they are unlikely to be causing any significant harm. Having
> searched high and low (sort of!) I can't seem to find any guidance on
> priority contaminants or working practice for such sites - possibly
> because they vary so widely in nature.
> 
> My question is, do any of you have a defined policy for dealing with
> such applications or are they dealt with on a case-by-case basis? I
> wouldn't want to insist on site investigation for every bit of
> agricultural land which is proposed for development, but then again I
> wouldn't want to find a garden had been previously used for sheep
> dipping!
> 
> Any help would be much appreciated.
> 
> Neil Brown
> Contaminated Land Officer
> West Lothian Council
> 
> ________________________________________________________________________
> This message, together with any attachments, is sent subject to the
> following statements:
> 
> 1.	It is sent in confidence for the addressee only.  It may
> 	contain legally privileged information.  The contents are 
> 	not to be disclosed to anyone other than the addressee.  
> 	Unauthorised recipients are requested to preserve this 
> 	confidentiality and to advise the sender immediately.
> 2.	It does not constitute a representation which is legally 
> 	binding on the Council or which is capable of constituting 
> 	a contract and may not be founded upon in any proceedings 
> 	following hereon unless specifically indicated otherwise.
> 
> http://www.westlothian.gov.uk
> 
> ________________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
> service on behalf of West Lothian Council. For more information on a
> proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe,
> visit http://www.messagelabs.com
> ________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Scanned by MailDefender - managed email security from intY -
> www.maildefender.net
> 
> Geotechnical Engineering Ltd, Rock House, Lower Tuffley Lane, Gloucester.
> GL2 5DT
> Registered office, No. 700739, England
> Telephone: 01452 527743
> Facsimile: 01452 507435
> www.geoeng.co.uk
>  
> This message is intended only for the named recipient. If you are not the
> intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing
> or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error please
> notify Geotechnical Engineering Ltd immediately. The recipient should
> check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses.
> Geotechnical Engineering Ltd accepts no liability for any damage caused by
> any virus transmitted by this email.
> 
> Scanned by MailDefender - managed email security from intY -
> www.maildefender.net
> 
> 
> Email Disclaimer is: 
> http://www.blackpool.gov.uk/EmailDisclaimer/
> This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft
> Exchange as part of the Council's e-mail and internet policy.
> 
> 
> ________________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
> service on behalf of West Lothian Council.
> For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
> around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
> ________________________________________________________________________
> << File: Heavy metal Contaminated Soils Associated with Drained Fenland in
> Lancashire, England, UK.pdf >> 

________________________________________________________________________
This message, together with any attachments, is sent subject to the
following statements:

1.	It is sent in confidence for the addressee only.  It may
	contain legally privileged information.  The contents are 
	not to be disclosed to anyone other than the addressee.  
	Unauthorised recipients are requested to preserve this 
	confidentiality and to advise the sender immediately.
2.	It does not constitute a representation which is legally 
	binding on the Council or which is capable of constituting 
	a contract and may not be founded upon in any proceedings 
	following hereon unless specifically indicated otherwise.

http://www.westlothian.gov.uk

________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service on behalf of West Lothian Council.
For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
November 1999
July 1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager