On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Tim Stevens wrote:
> The problem was indeed with the propagate function. When there was no
> shift for a resonance in the target peak's new shiftlist there was nothing
> to check the tolerances against and the resonance just became linked to
> the first available dim, rather than the same number dim as the source.
I'm not sure about this, but wouldn't going for the compatible dim with
the closest shift, rather than same numbering, be a good default behaviour
(at leat for propagate)? Using dim numbering assumes the spectra are
recorded in a particular way.
Brian
--
Dr. Brian O. Smith ---------------------- B Smith at bio gla ac uk
Division of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology,
Institute Biomedical & Life Sciences,
Joseph Black Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
Tel: 0141 330 5167/6459/3089 Fax: 0141 330 8640
|