Well, I mean by 'of sorts' that I never know what to think of what I'm doing when
I'm doing it, so I usually just call my writing 'stuff'. But thanks, Janet, for your
response here, and I'm glad you liked it and found it beautiful. And I just wrote
back to Doug's suggestions for cutting it, but I'm not sure less sprawling would
be a good idea either.
In any case, thanks,
Rebecca
---- Original message ----
>Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 14:51:26 +0800
>From: Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: peom of sorts
>To: [log in to unmask]
>
>What do you mean, "of sorts"?!
>It's one of the most beautiful things I've read
>for a while.
>
>You could edit it, make it less sprawling,
>but I'm not sure that would be a good idea.
>
>Janet
>------------------------------------------------------
>Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
>Poems at Proximity:
>http://www.arach.net.au/~huxtable/janet/proximity.html
>------------------------------------------------------
|