-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dear Developers,
Update: It looks like that this propagation has not happened only in
spectra that give i-1 connectivity like HNcoCA, HNCO, etc. I cannot
be sure that it did not happen in v1.0.8 as I may have overlooked it!
Best,
Murali.
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Murali Vadivelu <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: 14 February 2006 08:24:55 pm GMT
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Critical bug? - Fwd: Sorting
> Reply-To: CcpNmr software mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dear Developers,
>
> I have already assigned many of the NHs (initially anonymous) and I
> saw the corresponding 13C peaks (anonymous but connected i and i-1)
> in the various triple resonance experiments getting the appropiate
> assignement from the sequence and the i and i-1 connectivity
> information already present. I did it in 1.0.8. Now after a hiatus,
> I am opening the project in 1.0.9 with all the latest updates and
> find that many of these 13C peaks still have the old 'anonymous'
> spin system numbers instead of the residue name and number. I don't
> think its a problem with 1.0.9 as it was apparently good in v
> 1.0.9, though I can't be sure. It could be caused by a recent update?
>
> I am able to make analysis assign the proper residue name by doing
> R:Assign:Set sequential spin system:... or similar. I don't want to
> go through the whole procedure manually and unnecessarily!
>
> Could you please help to find out what could be causing this?
> Corrupted files? - I don't think so as I have used two different
> copies of the project and still get the same result.
>
> Many thanks.
>
> Best,
> Murali.
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Murali Vadivelu <[log in to unmask]>
>> Date: 14 February 2006 05:48:40 pm GMT
>> To: CcpNmr software mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: Fwd: Sorting
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> It seems to be not an issue with the sorting. For some reason,
>> some peaks remain unassigned. Say for example, I have most of my
>> NH peaks assigned. Corresponding 13C peaks from the triple
>> resonance experiments are already connected (i and i-1). This
>> should cause the assignment to spread automatically and it looked
>> it did, I did it in release 8 and using 9 now!
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> From: Murali Vadivelu <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Date: 14 February 2006 05:21:20 pm GMT
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Sorting
>>> Reply-To: CcpNmr software mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
>>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Sorting in Edit Peak List is sorting according to the 'position
>>> number' of the assigned residue in HNCA while its including the
>>> alphabets in HNCO. The earlier is preferred way of sorting or
>>> there could be an option to choose! Is this a bug?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFD8j8Em7hHUYJtaG4RAtbUAJ9BJ/yPpjzLIq7oZrtpyQfneIwt5QCg5UXy
12ZNAGspBwtybx8HvegyAgg=
=gCgF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|