on 12/2/06 8:22 AM, steve ash wrote:
> ..and two it ignores the fact
> that the fictional 'thought forms' you generate now
> can't hope to be as powerful as 'thought forms' that
> have been sustained for centuries if not millenia, and
> probably have somekind of archetypal basis.
Or even a basis in the reality of those beings who are involved?
Does the panel think that all deities and other wights are merely
thought-forms or archetypes?
Jez
--
Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so.
|