> Is it out of fatalism, habit, or perhaps religious belief that you and others
> on [and beyond] this list persist in framing this [the 'nuclear-decision']
> issue only in in terms of a vision that leaves the demand-as-usual curve
> unchallenged?
I agree with Aubrey. The only real solution is Consevation. But "not
consuming" is a threat to the economic system in a way that nuclear power is
not, so it seldom gets on the agenda in a serious way.
Instead of reactively opposing nuclear, how about seriously and proactively
advocating conservation?
John
=================================
John Scull
http://members.shaw.ca/jscull
There is more to life than increasing its speed.
--Gandhi
|