Vow! I thought I was making a dumb complaint, as it was followed by a
short silence. Thank you.
On 22 Jan 2006, at 02:38 pm, Tim Stevens wrote:
>> Whenever I say that the peak should be preceding in the sequence the
>> spin system gets assigned properly (NH belonging to a spin system and
>> the peak corresponding that NH but a preceding residue getting
>> another number indicating that it is a different, here preceding,
>> spin system).
>
> I think this is fixed by a patch made recently. There was a bug
> that was
> making new spin systems rather than using existing ones in some
> circumstances.
>
> T.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> Dr Tim Stevens Email: [log in to unmask]
> Department of Biochemistry [log in to unmask]
> University of Cambridge Phone: +44 1223 766022 (office)
> 80 Tennis Court Road +44 7816 338275 (mobile)
> Old Addenbrooke's Site +44 1223 364613 (home)
> Cambridge CB2 1GA WWWeb: http://www.bio.cam.ac.uk/~tjs23
> United Kingdom http://www.pantonia.co.uk
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> ------ +NH3CH(CH(CH3)OH)C(O)NHCH(CH(CH3)CH2CH3)C(O)NHCH(CH2CH2SCH3)
> CO2- -------
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
|