Hi Eric and Shari,
This paper treats Bayesian inference for 2nd level effects:
http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~woolrich/MW_NI_2004b.pdf
This paper is a good overview of mixed effects vs sumarry stats:
http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/doc/papers/karl_mixed.pdf
Best,
Alle Meije
Eric Zarahn wrote:
> Hello Shary,
>
> You mean a reference for the theory of second-level analyses? In a
> neuroimaging context, two immediately come to mind. One is a Andrew
> Holmes' HBM abstract (I believe it is from '98) and the other is a
> Neuroimage paper with Karl as one (or perhaps the first) author
> from a few years ago. The idea of the second paper was to compare
> modeling random subject and fixed population effects as opposed to
> using a summary image approach to population inference, the latter
> approach being what most of us on the list call a second-level
> analysis. (The reason for the vague citations is that I do not have
> access to my reference library from my current location. I will send
> on the complete references for these two papers to the list next
> week).
>
>
> Eric
>
> Quoting "(Mr.) Shahryar (Shary) Rafi-Tari" <[log in to unmask]>:
>
>
>>Hi Eric,
>>
>>I am also doing second level analysis. But, I wonder what is the
>>best reference for it so that I can refer to it in the paper I am
>>writing.
>>I appreciate it if you could give me a hint.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Shary
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Photos – NEW, now offering a quality print service from just 8p a photo http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
|