> To edit the wikipidea article is a job for someone at space syntax
> -whoever
> is responsible for it. Sorry.
>
Rui,
What a strange attitude, and one that fundamentally misses the point of
Wikipedia!
We are all 'responsible' for Wikipedia equally. Arguably, it is the
responsibility of those who find errors there to fix them for others, lest
this 'biased' information be propogated. As an independent, if anything,
I would rather that people from Space Syntax *didn't* edit it, as they
might further any perceived bias, surely?
Best,
Tom.
> All the best,
> Rui
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
>> Behalf Of Alasdair Turner
>> Sent: 27 January 2006 14:14
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: [SPACESYNTAX] Spatial networks
>>
>> It strikes me that the two are talking about different things: the
>> Wikipedia article seems to define "spatial networks" as networks of
>> "spatial elements", whilst the Boccaletti et al paper appears to define
>> "spatial networks" as being those which are spatially-located.
>>
>> I think, like you, I would tend to assume the latter rather than the
>> former if someone said "spatial network" to me. However, I can also
>> understand the Wikipedia definition: as "social networks" are networks
>> of people, "spatial networks" might be networks of spaces.
>>
>> I suppose the thing to do is to edit the Wikipedia article!
>>
>> --
>> Alasdair Turner
>> Course Director
>> MSc Adaptive Architecture and Computation
>> Bartlett School of Graduate Studies
>> UCL Gower Street LONDON WC1E 6BT
>>
>> http://www.aac.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/
>
|