There will be a meeting of the London Judgment & Decision Making group
next Wednesday, May 31st, with a presentation by Dr Elke Weber of the
Center for the Decision Sciences, University of Columbia. The title and
abstract of the presentation are given below.
LJDM meetings are held at 5pm on Wednesdays during term time, in room 313
of the UCL Psychology Department on Bedford Way. All welcome. The
Psychology Department building is on the corner of Bedford Way and Gordon
Square, map (showing Bedford Way) below:
http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newmap.srf?
x=529951&y=182185&z=1&sv=bedford+way&s
t=1&tl=Bedford+Way,+WC1&searchp=newsearch.srf&mapp=newmap.srf
- Matt Twyman & Nick Sevdalis
----------------------------------------
Different Objectives of Agricultural Decisions in the Argentine Pampas: Do
Farmers Maximize Expected Utility, Regret-Adjusted Expected Utility, or
the Prospect Theory Value Function?
Agricultural ecosystems play a central role in world food production and
food security. Agroecosystems combine the complexity, multiplicity of
scales, and feedbacks of biophysical interactions in natural ecosystems
with the additional intricacies of human decision-making. Here we describe
a project that aims to understand and model the dynamic interactions of
natural and human components in agroecosystems. Emphasis is placed on (a)
the impacts of interannual and inter-decadal climate variability and the
use of climate information, and (b) agricultural decision-making in the
light of climate variability, probabilistic climate information (e.g.,
seasonal forecasts or decadal projections), and other contextual factors
(economic, social, technological). The geographic focus is the Argentine
Pampas, a major agricultural area.
Actual use of climate information in agricultural decisions and the
production decisions themselves most likely deviate from frequently used
prescriptions (e.g., maximization of expected utility, EU). In a set of
simulations, we are exploring the effects of different objective functions
on optimal farm management strategies both without and with the
availability of seasonal climate forecasts. In addition to EU maximization
(as a benchmark), we examine the maximization of EU corrected for
anticipated regret, and the maximization of the expected value associated
with prospect theory. Preliminary results show differences in optimal
actions for the various objective functions and for different combinations
of parameters. The result of our simulations can be compared with data on
actual crop allocations made by farmers over the past several years and
with results of decision experiments to identify the best-fitting
objective function and its parameter values for each farmer. Output of our
analyses of individual farm decision makers will be used as input into
agent-based models of farm decision that allow us to test the effect of
new information, technologies, or institutions on crop allocations in the
region.
|