JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PLAGIARISM Archives


PLAGIARISM Archives

PLAGIARISM Archives


PLAGIARISM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PLAGIARISM Home

PLAGIARISM Home

PLAGIARISM  2006

PLAGIARISM 2006

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: List response to Acumen proposal

From:

George MacDonald Ross <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Plagiarism <[log in to unmask]>, George MacDonald Ross <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 7 Nov 2006 20:21:54 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (132 lines)

I think the message is that we should be entirely open about what
resources students have access to, but make it absolutely clear to them
that they will be rewarded both for acknowledging their sources, and for
the independent thinking they apply to those sources. The trick is to
set things up so that they can't fake the independent thinking. 

George.

-----Original Message-----
From: Plagiarism [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Burkhard Schafer
Sent: 07 November 2006 15:21
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: List response to Acumen proposal


A reply to both George and Penny
(whose email I cut and pasted below George's, for context)

My initial response was to agree without qualification with George (and 
I too "cut out the middle man" and give students past essay answers, 
both "best" and "worst" practice cases - its my job to make sure that 
they can't be used for plagiarism)

This would answer Penny's point: the code of conduct only has a business

model if it is robust enough that not only the students (who arguably 
could not care less) but academics see them as a teaching resource, and 
recommend them.

Indeed, when I was student, past essays were made available not just 
from my department and the student union, but mainstream publishers, 
either within textbooks or in self-standing collections.

Is it  a concern that students would pay for something the university 
can and maybe should provide, as George argues? Possibly. But then, we 
(well, every university I taught at or externaled) also recommend books 
for purchase. This too may disadvantage poorer students. They too could 
be provided for free by the university, through adequate library 
provisions. They too can be used for plagiarism. And judging from the 
second hand market in academic books, they too are regularly  bought by 
students "strategically", for exam purposes only, and then discarded.

Given the "convenient moral panic" over plagiarism and the political 
posturing it brought with it, this official endorsement of essay banks 
is unlikely to happen at present, I would guess.  If it were, some 
departments would still (or again) offer them for free, as a reason to 
chose them over competitors, others would refer to the "approved" banks.

This may diminish/destroy the market for the unapproved ones Detecting
misuse (or ideally preventing it from occurring in the first 
place, through careful question setting)would remain an issue, but one 
that does not get worse and arguably easier than in an environment where

  students can  get them only from banks that do not open up their data 
to turnitin.

One possible addition to the code though: One problem with essay banks 
(or indeed all online resources) is that they make is simply too easy to

cut and past, they are more tempting than the same product was in paper 
from. Now some forms of documents prevent this. I think JSTOR pdf files 
have the text select function disabled. A technical adjustment like this

would make the online essays more like traditional articles/books and 
reduce the temptation for inappropriate use.

Burkhard



George MacDonald Ross wrote:
> I'm very surprised that this highly original proposal hasn't generated
> any debate on the list.
>  
> I let my students see good essays written by students in previous 
> years
> on very similar topics. They know that I use Turnitin, so they can't 
> cheat by simply copying. The best students use these essays as
secondary 
> literature, and engage with them intellectually. For example, two
years 
> ago a student wrote an essay in which he criticised my interpretation
of 
> Kant (which the module is about), and I gave him high marks for 
> independence of thought. Last year, another student defended my 
> interpretation against what the previous student had written, and she 
> got high marks for the same reason. I think this is higher education
at 
> its best, when students are engaging with essays, whoever wrote them,
in 
> the same way as we academics engage with journal articles.
>  
> I don't see that Acumen is necessarily doing anything different from
> what I am already doing for my own students. My worry, as with other 
> for-profit agencies, is that rich students can buy services which 
> universities ought to be providing for free, and which poorer students

> can't afford.
>  
> George.
---------------------------------------------
Penelope Booth wrote
> Absolutely.
>  
> BUT - such unethical operators
> (a) might not sign up (would we know?) and
> (b) would not care anyway, as they don't now care.
>  
> Plus - would it mean that we would have identified the ones that 
> unethical students would like to use as they could then advertise not
having signed up as being somehow an 'advantage' to the student?
>  
> Anyay - I would still like some code so than we know who is and is 
> not......
>  
> Penny

************************************************************************
*
You are subscribed to the JISC Plagiarism mailing list. To Unsubscribe,
change your subscription options, or access list archives,  visit
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/PLAGIARISM.html
************************************************************************
*

*************************************************************************
You are subscribed to the JISC Plagiarism mailing list. To Unsubscribe, change
your subscription options, or access list archives,  visit
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/PLAGIARISM.html
*************************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
November 2023
October 2023
July 2023
May 2023
April 2023
January 2023
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
August 2021
May 2021
April 2021
January 2021
October 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
March 2020
February 2020
December 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
May 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager