Are we allowed to learn the name of "one of the curators" - or maybe
the name of the curator who is NOT the one who won't enter the
discussion but who may not have been approached so far? I do not
believe that the second approach would be invading the private sphere
of the one of the curators nor that of the other one of the curators.
Johannes Goebel
On Jun 16, 2006, at 10:20 AM, roger malina wrote:
> Dear Crumb
>
> For some time I have been in private
> email discussion with one of the curators
> of the ZKM project that we have been
> discussing.
>
> I have asked him for permission to
> make public our email exchanges
> but he has refused, telling me that he
> doesnt have time to deal with the
> response or discussion.
>
> I think that when someone creates a public
> act like this they must assume responsability
> for dealing with any "push back". The
> virtual world is full of real people. Having time
> to create a public project but not having the
> time to engage in discussion seems to be
> not much fun. Its easy to have fun by yourself
> at other peoples expense.
>
> He has appealed to freedom of speech
> and fun as some of the background to
> his project and doesnt understand why
> some of the people whose texts have
> been mashed without concurrence are
> objecting.
>
> The Leonardo/OLATS Advisory Board
> chaired by Marc Battier is discussing
> whether we will request that all reference
> that implies that Leonardo/OLATS has
> agreed to participate in the project be
> removed from their web site.
>
> roger malina
|