> as far as I am concerned, works commissioned by developers are not
> public art...
I agree, but I think there is a spectrum here - what do you think of
work commissioned for siting within a private development by a public
body as part of a mandatory % for art program? To be successful here
the developer/property-owner's constraints, particularly w.r.t.
long-term maintenance and upkeep need to be taken into consideration,
but the commissioning process is much closer to a public art in public
spaces model.
<M>
|