JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-LINK Archives


LIS-LINK Archives

LIS-LINK Archives


LIS-LINK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-LINK Home

LIS-LINK Home

LIS-LINK  2006

LIS-LINK 2006

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Recommended staffing levels?

From:

"E.F.Tilley" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

E.F.Tilley

Date:

Mon, 3 Jul 2006 10:15:40 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (109 lines)

Lock Ms S wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> A Further Education Library colleague is looking for information about
> recommended levels of service provision, for example, how many
> professional library staff and staff in general a library should have
> per student/user/FTE in an institution, etc. etc.
> 
> Cilip provide a useful Jobs & Careers section, but does anyone know of
> any figures (hopefully compiled outside of the sector to help add more
> weight to the argument?).
> 
> I'm sure you can all appreciate (and even relate) to why this
> information is needed so any advice and assistance would be gratefully
> received.
> 
> Regards,
> Selena.
> 
> 
> 

Dear Selena,

As one of the few remaining professional staff in Bangor I can certainly 
appreciate why this information is needed!

There appears (to my knowledge) to be a lack of prescriptive standards 
for academic library services, both in the FE and HE sectors. I believe 
there were some such standards way back in the 1970s,(the name Atkinson 
comes to mind), but these are now clearly out-of-date.

Prescriptive standards may in any case be out of step with modern 
mangement thinking - not much point saying how many staff you need 
without saying what you want to do with them. The idea now is that you 
have to define your objectives in relation to those of the organisation 
as a whole, and get the institution to commit to the resources necessary 
to achieve them. COHFE used to produce a set of indicative objectives 
for the use of people setting such standards in their organisations; 
don't know whether these are still around.

A method used by many universities to compare themselves with other 
institutions is benchmarking. SCONUL produces a set of benchmark figures 
for university library expenditure annually, but I'm not sure what 
happens in FE. The trouble with benchmarking is that it measures only 
how much money is spent on the service, not what is done with the money. 
Low benchmarks are meant to be "good", but all they really say is that 
the service is cheap. Some might say you get what you pay for....

One of the arguments used by management in Bangor in defence of the cuts 
was that our benchmarks were very high in relation to those of 
comparitor institutions. What they had conveniently ignored was that we, 
unlike any of these other institutions, had 8 branch libraries to run. 
We had an independent benchmarking study done by the people in 
Loughborough who produce the SCONUL statistics, which proved that in 
reality not only were the benchmarks broadly in line with everyone else, 
but we actually had fewer professional staff than most other 
universities. These new figures were not, however, taken up by 
management, whose main concern was apparently to defend their original 
position.

The good news from Bangor is that we now have a new University 
Librarian, Alison MacKenzie, and have succeeded in obtaining two new 
professional posts, one of Electronic Resources Librarian, and one of 
Research Support Librarian. So if anyone in your institution tries to 
tell you that Bangor is living proof that you can run a library with no 
professional librarians, you can answer that it ISN'T TRUE!

Eileen Tilley





-- 
Eileen Tilley  Tel 01248 351151 x 2918  [log in to unmask]



-- 
Gall y neges e-bost hon, ac unrhyw atodiadau a anfonwyd gyda hi,
gynnwys deunydd cyfrinachol ac wedi eu bwriadu i'w defnyddio'n unig
gan y sawl y cawsant eu cyfeirio ato (atynt). Os ydych wedi derbyn y
neges e-bost hon trwy gamgymeriad, rhowch wybod i'r anfonwr ar
unwaith a dilëwch y neges. Os na fwriadwyd anfon y neges atoch chi,
rhaid i chi beidio â defnyddio, cadw neu ddatgelu unrhyw wybodaeth a
gynhwysir ynddi. Mae unrhyw farn neu safbwynt yn eiddo i'r sawl a'i
hanfonodd yn unig  ac nid yw o anghenraid yn cynrychioli barn
Prifysgol Cymru, Bangor. Nid yw Prifysgol Cymru, Bangor yn gwarantu
bod y neges e-bost hon neu unrhyw atodiadau yn rhydd rhag firysau neu
100% yn ddiogel. Oni bai fod hyn wedi ei ddatgan yn uniongyrchol yn
nhestun yr e-bost, nid bwriad y neges e-bost hon yw ffurfio contract
rhwymol - mae rhestr o lofnodwyr awdurdodedig ar gael o Swyddfa
Cyllid Prifysgol Cymru, Bangor.  www.bangor.ac.uk

This email and any attachments may contain confidential material and
is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s).  If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately
and delete this email.  If you are not the intended recipient(s), you
must not use, retain or disclose any information contained in this
email.  Any views or opinions are solely those of the sender and do
not necessarily represent those of the University of Wales, Bangor.
The University of Wales, Bangor does not guarantee that this email or
any attachments are free from viruses or 100% secure.  Unless
expressly stated in the body of the text of the email, this email is
not intended to form a binding contract - a list of authorised
signatories is available from the University of Wales, Bangor Finance
Office.  www.bangor.ac.uk

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager