JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-EDUC Archives


LIS-EDUC Archives

LIS-EDUC Archives


LIS-EDUC@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-EDUC Home

LIS-EDUC Home

LIS-EDUC  2006

LIS-EDUC 2006

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

school librarians face pay cuts

From:

Emily Witham <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Emily Witham <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:38:53 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (99 lines)

please find bellow an article from the TES front page:

http://www.tes.co.uk/2318752 
Librarians face pay cuts 

Elizabeth Buie 
Published: 15 December 2006 

 
School librarians are warning that the single status job evaluation 
process is leading to pay cuts in some authorities and a potential exodus 
from the profession. There have been accusations that the whole exercise 
is flawed because it fails to recognise the educational role of school 
librarians. 



In North Lanarkshire, where the evaluation process has been completed 
earlier than in some other authorities, school librarians have been put 
down a grade. 
This means that although the basic salary of around £20,000 will be 
conserved for three years, thereafter it will drop to £17,000. 

Already, two of the 27 school librarians in the authority have resigned 
from their jobs to retrain as primary teachers. 

Unison, the union representing many school librarians and other school 
staff affected by the evaluation ? office administrators, ICT back-up 
staff, technicians, and outdoor instructors ? says it is ?very concerned? 
that a system intended to deliver equal pay for women seems to be 
delivering cuts in the pay of already low-paid women in some cases. 

Glyn Hawker, Unison Scottish Organiser, said: ?Obviously, we will look at 
individual or group cases of detriment in specific authorities and, where 
members are being unfairly treated for whatever reason, we will back 
appeals and/or other appropriate action on their behalf.? 

However, different authorities are proceeding at different speeds and 
using different templates or evaluation schemes, making the situation even 
more complex. 

Lindesay Burton, library resource centre manager at Kilsyth Academy, said 
school librarians in North Lanarkshire had lodged an appeal against the 
downgrading decision. 

?We feel the questions did not apply to our position and the work we do. 
They took no account of the fact we are very involved with children and 
classes. We certainly don?t teach whole classes but we do teach half 
classes. 

?So many points are allocated for different aspects of our job, but we 
were found to be three points short of our current grade. They said our 
job was sedentary, that we might get up occasionally to get to a 
workstation. But this is not a job you can easily categorise.? 

A school librarian from another authority, where the outcome of the 
evaluation exercise is imminent, said she and her colleagues feared they 
too would be downgraded, largely because of the nature of the evaluation 
exercise. 

?The questions are designed for office workers, such as how many people 
they supervised, budgets, how many hours they spent on their feet. The 
questions had absolutely nothing to do with our educational input into the 
school.? 

Rhona Arthur, assistant director of CILIPS (the Chartered Institute of 
Library and Information Professionals in Scotland), said her institute was 
concerned about the way skills and competencies of school library staff 
were being evaluated within the scheme. 

They provided support for ICT, supported learning and teaching, and helped 
pupils with literacy and information literacy. 

They also offered a different environment which encouraged flexible and 
independent learning for some pupils with literacy and numeracy problems, 
she said. 

Gavin Whitefield, chief executive of North Lanarkshire Council, said: ?
Despite extensive negotiations, it was not possible to reach a collective 
agreement with the trade unions which would have offered the best solution 
in implementing job evaluation/single status. The council had reached a 
point where it had to move forward to ensure we have a suitable pay and 
grading structure and protect the council from future equal pay claims, so 
the council agreed to implement the pay and grading model with effect from 
November 6.? 

Mr Whitefield said any employee who was not satisfied with the evaluation 
of their post could appeal. 

The council would also look again at posts where the salary will reduce 
after the three-year cash conservation period to see if the job 
description, and therefore the grade, could be changed, he added. 
 

 
 
 
 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager