JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-E-RESOURCES Archives


LIS-E-RESOURCES Archives

LIS-E-RESOURCES Archives


LIS-E-RESOURCES@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-E-RESOURCES Home

LIS-E-RESOURCES Home

LIS-E-RESOURCES  2006

LIS-E-RESOURCES 2006

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

American Medical Association - Another Tale of Woe

From:

Lesley Crawshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

An informal open list set up by the UK Serials Group <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 6 Apr 2006 12:51:22 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (75 lines)

Hi,

We have subscriptions to two of AMA's journals, one a site license for JAMA
and the other a print/online subscription to Archives of General Psychiatry.


We have had problems with both of these subscriptions in 2006, one of which
has now been resolved and the other which we our agent is now trying to get
resolved.

1. JAMA - on the 17/01/06 we were informed by the AMA that the invoice sent
to our agent on the 19/10/05 hadn't been paid, and that as we were nearing
the end of our gracing period we would lose access unless they received
payment asap. It turned out that our agent had indeed made the payment on
the 07/12/05 for 2006. We informed AMA of this and were later informed that
they had had a temporary person helping out for a while and that the payment
had not been entered as paid in their database. We did receive an apology
from AMA for this and we were assured that the system the AMA uses would
never cut us off if we had paid or if they knew we had the intention of
paying. That statement unfortunately doesn't seem to have applied to the
problem we've had with the Archives of General Psychiatry - see below.

2. Archives of General Psychiatry - on the 24/03/06 I received an alert from
Highwire saying that our access to the AGP would expire on the 31/03/06. We
immediately contacted our agent who then checked their system and informed
us that the cheque that they had sent to the publisher on the 02/12/05
hadn't been cashed. In the meantime they would stop the cheque and issue a
new payment. At the same time I tried to get our access to AGP extended to
avoid inconvenience to our users whilst the problem with payment was
resolved. I contacted the person at AMA who had dealt with the problem with
JAMA, but was told they only dealt with site licenses and that our agent
needed to contact the Unified Service Centre. I tried to contact the
publisher at this number, but unfortunately ending up speaking to one of
those call centre "automatons" who just kept saying we hadn't paid our
account and to contact our agent and then basically bye bye! On the 31/03/06
I received an alert from Highwire saying our account had now expired. We've
informed our agent of this and they are now trying to resolve this with the
publisher.

These incidents illustrate how easily access can be lost even though payment
had been made by our agent for both journals for the 2006 subscription year.
They also illustrate some differences in the AMA's customer support for
those who have site licenses and those who have print/online subscriptions.
With the site license we received direct contact from AMA giving us a chance
to look into the problem and get it resolved. That personal contact enabled
us to resolve the situation without fear of our users losing access. With
the print/online subscription we had to rely on Highwire for notifying us of
the impending problems with AGP and it was difficult to have any personal
contact with the AMA and get some extended grace whilst the problem was
resolved. In both cases we've paid for these subscriptions. In both cases
our agent had made the necessary payments. In both cases precious time and
effort has had to be expended by ourselves and our agent trying to get this
sorted, and this is just for two journals.

Surely there should be some process in place whereby this publisher had
double-checked with our agent, before withdrawing access? We are the
innocent party here, but yet our users are the ones who will suffer. If this
had happened all of this could have been avoided. Also, do agents routinely
check for non-cashed payments they've made to publishers? If these
additional quality checks had been in operation this might have avoided both
of these situations.

Cheers
Lesley

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lesley Crawshaw, Faculty Information Consultant
Learning and Information Services
University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, AL10 9AB
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
email: [log in to unmask]
phone: 01707 284662 fax: 01707 284666
list owner: [log in to unmask]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager