Thanks Steven,
that information might be useful in the documentation to site managers
trying to understand what should be upgraded (and what not!), and to figure
out which configuration is optimal for their sites...
Btw. does this mean that you cannot have pure glite site, available through
glite WMS?
Regards, Antun
-----
Antun Balaz
Research Assistant
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Web: http://scl.phy.bg.ac.yu/
Phone: +381 11 3160260, Ext. 152
Fax: +381 11 3162190
Scientific Computing Laboratory
Institute of Physics, Belgrade
Serbia and Montenegro
-----
---------- Original Message -----------
From: "Burke, S (Stephen)" <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Tue, 16 May 2006 17:30:02 +0100
Subject: Re: [LCG-ROLLOUT] GRIS
> LHC Computer Grid - Rollout
> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Antun Balaz
> said:
> > a) For gLite CE it is stated that "normal gLite CE
> > configuration has no site
> > BDII". How many production sites does not have site BDII on
> > CE? I think that by default site BDII should be installed.
>
> You only need one site BDII and production sites should still have an
> LCG CE, so right now it isn't too much of a problem, although it
> needs to be fixed in the long run.
>
> > Etc. etc. Maybe the GRIS should be added as well as a node
> > type (and other
> > things as well), or it should not be present at all - glite
> > experts will
> > probably soon provide more details.
>
> The GRIS is replaced by a BDII; you get the same info, but under
> mds-vo-name=resource and port 2170 instead of mds-vo-name=local and port
> 2135.
>
> Stephen
------- End of Original Message -------
|