We note that the situation for the rpm lists is in constant evolution.
We found that now is used an url like the following:
http://glite.web.cern.ch/glite/packages/R3.0/deployment/<PROFILE>/<RPM_VERSION>/<PROFILE>-<RPM_VERSION>.rpm.list.txt
(in some case also the subversion of rpm is used).
Is it right?
Thank you,
Simone
Markus Schulz wrote:
> Hi,
> the RPM lists have been improved for the gLite-3.0 updates please have
> a look at: http://glite.web.cern.ch/glite/packages/R3.0/
> R20060502/default.asp
>
> The dependencies that are covered are as deep as they have been before.
>
> markus
>
>
> On Jul 11, 2006, at 12:12 PM, Andrea Chierici wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I am writing to ask for a better support for quattor on the next
>> glite releases.
>> With the former lcg releases, all the rpms required by every grid
>> element were explicitly listed in the apt repositories and
>> translating the installation into quattor templates was quite
>> straightforward. With the latest glite release things have changed a
>> lot and we could not so easily find all the rpms required, directly.
>> It seems that the apt repositories and dependencies are not as
>> complete as before: as apt resolves many missing dependencies
>> automatically, this is not a problem for people using it, but becomes
>> a problem for people using quattor, where all the rpms need to be
>> explicitly declared. It has been a painful trial and error procedure
>> to install glite at CNAF, where installing some rpms caused some
>> failing dependencies to come out, that needed to be resolved and so
>> on... What is the problem to use the previous approach to the list
>> preparation?
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Andrea
>>
>> --
>> Andrea Chierici - INFN-CNAF Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 BOLOGNA
>> Office Tel: +39 051 6092809
>> WEB Page: www.cnaf.infn.it/~chierici
>> ICQ#2328798, MSN#ataruz<at>gmail.com, Skype#ataruz
>> --
>>
>> <andrea.chierici.vcf>
|