I confess I have no idea what "groundlessness" is.
Any idea that has merit has a simple explanation,
even that explanation is only by analogy.
I am afraid Marks explanation cast no light at all
for me.
At this point in time the term appears have more wind
than substance - but I'm willing to learn.
I would need a _clear_ explanation, rather than one which
a contender for a prize from the plain English
society.
Peter
|