On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 19:34 +0000, J.L.Schonfelder wrote:
> What we lack is a way of stating that a local value is to be constant
> for
> an invocation but possibly different for different invocations, but
> this is
> a minority interest!
I proposed "dynamic parameters" for the 2008 work list, but it didn't
make it onto the J3 list, let alone the WG5 list. Their values would
have been given by specification expressions, i.e., the same sort of
expressions that can be used for array dimensions. The expected usage
was to compute array dimensions once, and then use them for several
arrays.
--
Van Snyder | What fraction of Americans believe
[log in to unmask] | Wrestling is real and NASA is fake?
Any alleged opinions are my own and have not been approved or disapproved
by JPL, CalTech, NASA, Frederick Gregory, George Bush, or anybody else.
|