JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ACCESSIBUILT Archives


ACCESSIBUILT Archives

ACCESSIBUILT Archives


ACCESSIBUILT@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ACCESSIBUILT Home

ACCESSIBUILT Home

ACCESSIBUILT  2006

ACCESSIBUILT 2006

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: GP Surgery on 1st and 2nd floors

From:

Rita Newton <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Accessibuilt list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:47:41 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (210 lines)

Hi Jane

Don't disagree with any of the discussion especially given the context, and
think I would be signing the petition! Just providing a perspective of a
different situation where the absence of a lift works okay, in an existing
building, with no plans for refurbishment. 

Rita



-----Original Message-----
From: Accessibuilt list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Jane Simpson
Sent: 10 October 2006 09:31
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ACCESSIBUILT] GP Surgery on 1st and 2nd floors

Rita the argument is that the surgeries is on first and second floor because
the financial gains for ground floor units is high. The importance is not
which levels they are on, they have to be accessible Building Regulations
require all levels to be accessible, so a lift will be required. I wouldn't
try to fight for ground floor but try to obtain the best access possible, in
fact I don't like being in a ground floor room seeing my GP with people
walking past.

The size of lift, stairs positions, ability to comprehend, evacuation and
ability locate the surgery, etc, etc and other things are what is important
and I would argue they are relevant internal arrangements which planning
should be considering.

When considering the size of the lift B Regs argues that a 2000 x 1400 lift
will accommodate any chair. I would put a plea for a 2000 deep, not wide,
for this to be the case. The size does need to be considered in usage terms
as well, many people use lifts not just wheelchair users. I would try to
argue for a large lift to be provided because people may need to be
stretchered out (possibly!!) or to ensure that all people can access the
surgery.

Just some thoughts.

Jane

Jane Simpson BA Grad Dip Arch RIBA
Regional Manager
For and on behalf of
Aedas Access Consultancy
Norwich Union House
High Street
Huddersfield
HD1 2LF

T:      +44 (01484) 537411
M:     +44  07813 301683
F:      +44 (01484) 530332
E:      [log in to unmask]
W: 	www.aedas.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Accessibuilt list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Rita Newton
Sent: 10 October 2006 09:00
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: GP Surgery on 1st and 2nd floors

Dear All

Apologies, have missed some of the emails on this, so I'm probably going off
at a tangent. 

Our GP surgery is on two floors.

If a person with an appointment is seeing a doctor who has his surgery on
that particular day upstairs, the person informs the receptionist that they
would prefer to see the doctor in a downstairs room, for which the surgery
always keep one downstairs room free (there will be at least
2 doctors upstairs at any one time), and the GP bobs downstairs to see the
patient because the computer tells him / her to do so. The patient does not
need to need to justify to the receptionist why the doctor should come
downstairs to see them. 

This has been the everyday practice at the surgery for at least 20 years,
and in my experience the system works well.

Rita

-----Original Message-----
From: Accessibuilt list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Anthony Rylands
Sent: 10 October 2006 08:34
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ACCESSIBUILT] GP Surgery on 1st and 2nd floors

Vin,

Any building in general terms always has to be fit for purpose in planning
terms. There would be an opportunity to argue that the standard of access at
upper floor level because of the need to use a lift would not be as good as
having facilities n the ground floor. The question will be is it good
enough... Here you may need to obtain support from any DoH, PCT or general
NHS guidance on health centre design.

It would be the role of the Planning Officer to assess the overall layout
and form of the development even though they will not deal directly with the
internal issues.

Anthony Rylands
Access Officer for Disabled People
North Somerset Council
Tel: 01934 634989
E-mail: [log in to unmask]

Please consider the environment. Do you really need to print this email?



-----Original Message-----
From: Accessibuilt list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Sam Chapman
Sent: 10 October 2006 00:20
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: GP Surgery on 1st and 2nd floors

I hate to say this but, shouldn't the developer or/and architect taken into
consideration the fact that wheelchair an impaired mobility access issues
should be part of their design? Furthermore, the surgery being above ground
level, means that a lift be built into the design. 

I am being very cynical here, but I suspect the developer or
owner/leaseholder are trying a fast one, maybe so that once the building is
put up, they apply for a grant or financial support etc to install a lift,
rather than include the lift in the cost of the building. That old often
heard lame excuse, that only young people live in the area, should clobbered
straight on the head with, Ok, so what happens if someone is disabled due to
an accident, or a parent has a disabled child? 

If this is a planning proposal being put up for acceptance, stand your
ground and get them to try and justify why they should NOT fit a lift in the
building! A hydraulic lift as made by someone like Phoenix Lifts, is
considerably less than the traditional cable tethered OTIS type lift, and
someone should point the developer/owner/leaseholder or health authority in
their direction.

Sam Chapman

----------End of Message----------
Run by SURFACE for more information on research, consultancy and the
distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design programme
visit:
http://www.inclusive-design.it
Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html

*********************************************************
PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
*********************************************************
The information contained in this email transmission is intended by North
Somerset Council for the use of the named individual or entity to which it
is directed and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise
confidential.  If you have received this email transmission in error, please
delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the
sender of the error by reply email. 
Any views expressed within this message or any other associated files are
the views and expressions of the individual and not North Somerset Council.
North Somerset Council takes all reasonable precautions to ensure that no
viruses are transmitted with any electronic communications sent, however the
Council can accept no responsibility for any loss or damage resulting
directly or indirectly from the use of this email or any contents or
attachments.
www.n-somerset.gov.uk
Main switchboard: 01934 888888
********************************************************

----------End of Message----------
Run by SURFACE for more information on research, consultancy and the
distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design programme
visit:
http://www.inclusive-design.it
Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html

----------End of Message----------
Run by SURFACE for more information on research, consultancy and the
distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design programme
visit:
http://www.inclusive-design.it
Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html 
 
This message has been scanned for known viruses with Sybari Antigen and
mailCritical. 
 

This message has been scanned for known viruses with Sybari Antigen and
mailCritical.
Please see our standard disclaimer at: www.aedas.com/emaildisclaimer.htm

----------End of Message----------
Run by SURFACE for more information on research, consultancy and the
distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design programme visit:
http://www.inclusive-design.it
Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html

----------End of Message----------
Run by SURFACE for more information on research, consultancy and the distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design programme visit:
http://www.inclusive-design.it
Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
October 2023
August 2023
June 2023
May 2023
March 2023
January 2023
November 2022
September 2022
August 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager