I'm not sure, but isn't this showing where:
effect size (a>b) is correlated with your covariates
Mark
[log in to unmask] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have a concern with our simple correlation resulting map.
>
> From our fixed effects model we have a contrast image resulting from a
> condition a>b. The resulting contrast images for each subject are fed into
> the simple regression analysis with a string of correlates. Does the
> resulting positive correlation map show us:
>
> 1. correlations where a>b only ? (Y >0)
> 2. where a>b and b>a ? (Y> and < 0)
>
> Simply does the original contrast image, a>b include voxels that have a
> positive and negative value or only those having a positive value.
>
> Thanks in advance for you time and thoughts.
> Maria
|