JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SPM Archives


SPM Archives

SPM Archives


SPM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SPM Home

SPM Home

SPM  2006

SPM 2006

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Segmentation question

From:

Ged Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Ged Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:39:07 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (83 lines)

Many thanks Paul,

Can I ask a more specific question: are the ventricles completely
surrounded by a thin layer of GM? That appears to be the case looking
at the GM TPM. I'm not sure whether your comment about the caudate
nucleus "lining" the ventricles has already answered this question, or
if you just meant that it's alongside parts of the ventricles.

Presumably if the TPMs are expert-segmented then partial-volume
effects shouldn't be too important, although they of course will be in
SPM/FAST/etc.

Thanks again,
Ged.


Paul Laurienti wrote:
> Andreas and Ged,
>
> Your question is pretty interesting and is likely a combination of real anatomy and some volume averaging. For example, if you look at the template image that was attached in Ged's email the crosshairs are located directly on the body of the caudate nucleus. This structure is definitely gray matter and lines the ventricles. There is also the stria terminalis adjacent to the caudate that contains gray matter. Both of these structures would be located on the floor of the body of the lateral ventricle in a coronal sections but are in the roof of the temporal horn of the lateral ventricles. The fornix is located adjacent to the roof in the body of the lateral ventricles and includes considerable amounts of non-white matter tissue including choroid plexus that may be segmented into gray matter. Of course as Ged noted, volume averaging between white matter and csf may play a role as well.
>
> Paul
>
>
> ------------
> Paul J. Laurienti, MD, PhD
> Department of Radiology
> Wake Forest University School of Medicine
> Medical Center Blvd
> Winston-Salem, NC 27157
> 336-716-3261
> [log in to unmask]
> www.fmri.wfubmc.edu/laurienti.htm
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SPM (Statistical Parametric Mapping) [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of DRC SPM
> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 6:55 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [SPM] Segmentation question
>
> Hi Andreas, everyone,
>
> I can't offer much help, but I can confirm that this occurs with SPM5 too. The attached screengrab shows the native and the modulated-normalised segmentations of the avg152T1 brain, using the default parameters (except for changing template to average-sized, since the image and the template should match pretty well here...).
>
> Andreas, I don't know whether you used a smoothed version of the
> avg152 (as in the spm5/templates dir) but I've used the unsmoothed version here, as you can see there is definitely GM around the ventricles.
>
> I too had heard that this shouldn't be the case, and my explanation/guess was that the partial volume effect of blending CSF and WM was resulting in an average intensity that looked like GM, hence SPM5's segmentation (incidentally, FSL FAST gives similar results, see third attachment).
>
> What's confusing me now though is that I looked at the GM TPM (screenshot attached), and that also shows GM around the ventricles -- I was under the impression that this was the result of expert manual segmentation, so are you certain that there shouldnt' be any grey around the ventricles (I'm not! But hopefully there's at least one person reading this who's brave enough to step forward as a neuroanatomy expert...)
>
> As for whether this is a problem, well, pragmatically, if your spm results have significant GM change where you expect no GM then you're free to ignore those areas, but of course, it would be nice if one didn't have to do too much "interpretation"
> (censoring/fishing/smooth-talking) for the results...
>
> Interested to hear more on this,
> Ged.
>
>
> On 09/03/06, Andreas Jansen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Dear list -
>>
>> a question about the segmentation algorithm in SPM2.
>>
>> I segmented some T1-weighted images. Everything looked fine, expect
>> that - according to the segmented images - the ventricles are
>> surrounded by a closed ring of grey matter. I was told that this does
>> not reflect the typical neuroanatomy.
>>
>> I was not sure whether this is something that arises only in my images
>> or generally in all images, so I took the canonical SPM single-subject
>> T1-template and segmented it as well. Again, the ventricles were
>> surrounded by gray matter.
>>
>> I am just asking me whether this can become a problem in e.g. VBM studies?
>>
>> Best wishes, Andreas
>>
>> --
>> Echte DSL-Flatrate dauerhaft für 0,- Euro*!
>> "Feel free" mit GMX DSL! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
>>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager