JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SPM Archives


SPM Archives

SPM Archives


SPM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SPM Home

SPM Home

SPM  2006

SPM 2006

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: [Fwd: Re: [SPM] Estimation problem in Face data set]

From:

Will Penny <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Will Penny <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 17:59:27 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (170 lines)

Dear Andreas,

I've re-run my analysis of the face data but
have been unable to replicate your bug.

spm_reml ran fine.

To help us solve this problem could you send your SPM.mat
file* to Karl, who will then have a look at this.

Best wishes,

Will.

*Or better still, if you type dbstop if error and then
save the variables that are passed to spm_reml.m in a file
'for_karl.mat' and then send just these to him - that would
be optimal !

Will Penny wrote:

> Dear Karl,
>
> There seems to be a problem with ReML.
>
> This time, from an fMRI analysis of Rik's face repetition data.
>
> This estimated fine when I wrote the manual. And Rik
> repeated the analysis a week or two ago. So it must be a
> recent development.
>
> Perhaps you could help ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Will.
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [SPM] Estimation problem in Face data set
> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 16:15:28 -0500
> From: Walsh, Nicholas <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Walsh, Nicholas <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> Yes - I'm still stuck at this stage and it is unclear where to go next.
>
> Any help and advice from the SPM manual authors would be great as to
> whether it is a bug.
>
> Nick
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SPM (Statistical Parametric Mapping) [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Andreas Bruns
> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 10:29 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [SPM] Estimation problem in Face data set
>
> Dear All,
>
> I encountered the same problem as Juan and Nick (both 24 Feb, "Help with
>
> estimation problems", "Error when estimating model"), and moreover, it
> shows up while processing the "Face" example data set (SPM5 manual,
> chapter
> 29). After successful spatial processing and model specification, the
> error
> occurs during model estimation (section 29.2.1):
>
> ********************************
>
> Initialising parameters :
> ...initialised
>
> Plane 1/46 , block 1/9 : ...read & mask data
> Plane 1/46 , block 2/9 : ...read & mask data
> Plane 1/46 , block 3/9 : ...read & mask data
> .
> .
> .
> Plane 46/46 , block 7/9 : ...read & mask data
> Plane 46/46 , block 8/9 : ...read & mask data
> Plane 46/46 , block 9/9 : ...done
> Temporal non-sphericity (over voxels) : ...REML estimation
> ReML Block - 1
> ReML Iteration : 1 ...NaN
> Warning: Matrix is close to singular or badly scaled.
> Results may be inaccurate. RCOND = -1.000000e+00.
>
>> In spm_reml at 90
>
> In spm_spm at 855
> In spm_config_fmri_est>run_est at 382
> In spm_jobman>run_struct1 at 1384
> In spm_jobman>run_struct1 at 1392
> In spm_jobman>run_struct1 at 1392
> In spm_jobman>run_struct at 1351
> ??? Error using ==> svd
> NaN or Inf prevents convergence.
>
> ??? Error while evaluating uicontrol Callback.
>
> ********************************
>
> The problem obviously is that in 'spm_reml', lines 76ff., the matrix 'C'
>
> looks "unsuspicious" in the 1st iteration (k=1), but contains merely
> NaN's
> around the diagonal in the 2nd iteration (k=2):
>
>>> num2str(full(C(1:10,1:10)),'% 8.3f')
>
> ans =
> NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 0.000 0.000 0.000
> 0.000
> NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 0.000 0.000
> 0.000
> NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 0.000
> 0.000
> NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN
> 0.000
> NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN
> NaN
> NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN
> NaN
> 0.000 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN
> NaN
> 0.000 0.000 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN
> NaN
> 0.000 0.000 0.000 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN
> NaN
> 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN
> NaN
>
> However, before going deeper into the matter, I would like to know
> whether
> this might be an SPM5 bug, since the problem already occurs in one of
> the
> example data sets. I am working with MATLAB R14SP3 under Linux and am
> using
> SPM5 revision no. 456.
>
> Any help is greatly appreciated. Best regards,
>
> Andreas
>
> ------------------
> Dr. Andreas Bruns
> Biozentrum, University of Basel
> Klingelbergstrasse 50/70
> 4056 Basel
> Switzerland
> ------------------
>
>
>
>

--
William D. Penny
Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience
University College London
12 Queen Square
London WC1N 3BG

Tel: 020 7833 7475
FAX: 020 7813 1420
Email: [log in to unmask]
URL: http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/~wpenny/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager