JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for INT-BOUNDARIES Archives


INT-BOUNDARIES Archives

INT-BOUNDARIES Archives


INT-BOUNDARIES@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

INT-BOUNDARIES Home

INT-BOUNDARIES Home

INT-BOUNDARIES  2006

INT-BOUNDARIES 2006

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Bhutan's boundaries with India and China

From:

Brendan Whyte <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Brendan Whyte <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 27 Jun 2006 10:04:03 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (212 lines)

2 articles, one each on Bhutan's boundaries with India and with 
China, from Bhutan's daily English-language "Kuensel" (Enlightenment"):

************************************************
http://www.kuenselonline.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=7126

Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:26 am (PST)

Bhutan-India border reaches last stage of demarcation
Posted on Saturday, June 24, 2006, @ 04:58:46 EDT


National Assembly: 24 June 2006- The demarcation of Bhutan's southern 
boundary, with India, was nearly completed, according to the 
Secretary for International Boundaries, Dasho Pema Wangchuk, who was 
responding to queries raised by the chimis who were following up on 
the discussions of previous Assembly sessions.

The Sarpang chimi, T.P Humagai, said that the people knew that the 
two governments had held talks several times but wanted to know the 
results and what was actually happening. It was important that the 
boundary was finalised before the adoption of the Constitution.

The Samtse chimi, Sangay Khandu, reminded the members that the issue 
had been discussed in detail during the 83rd and the 84th sessions 
and His Majesty the King had advised that the work should be 
completed by the end of 2006.

Briefing the National Assembly members the Secretary explained that 
Bhutan's southern boundary had been demarcated since 1963, under the 
supervision of the Commissioner for southern Bhutan. By 1971, 
boundary demarcations as well as boundary pillars were completed and 
endorsed by the two governments in October, 1971.

There were some problems in the Phuentsholing and Jaigaon area in 
2001 because many boundary pillars were found missing. The two 
governments had decided that the boundary pillars should be re-constructed.

The Secretary said that the entire boundary between Bhutan and India 
was covered by 62 strip maps. A total of 47 boundary strip maps had 
been signed between the two countries and only 15 remained in 2005. A 
meeting of the two governments in December, 2005, concluded with the 
signing seven more strips, five covering the Bhutan-Arunachal Pradesh 
sector and two falling in the Bhutan-Assam sector. "We are working 
with India to complete the last eight strips by 2006," said Dasho 
Pema Wangchuk.

It was planned that seven main pillars and 39 subsidiary pillars 
would be constructed in the Bhutan and Sikkim sector. With work 
started in January, 2006, four main pillars and 28 subsidiary pillars 
were now constructed along the Bhutan-Sikkim border.

Along the Nichu-Jaldaka river segment of the Bhutan-West Bengal 
border it was planned that 12 main pillars and 128 subsidiary/minor 
pillars would be constructed and, since January, 2006, five main 
pillars and 64 subsidiary pillars were constructed.

The Bhutan-Assam sector had 168 main pillars and 801 subsidiary 
pillars. The joint team had confirmed that 140 main pillars and 600 
subsidiary pillars were completed.

On the Bhutan-Arunachal Pradesh sector the meeting had decided to 
take up maintenance work for 104 boundary pillars, starting from 
June, 2006. The secretary said that, once the maintenance of the 
boundary pillars was over, the boundary strip maps and the completed 
pillars were being handed over to the local authorities of both sides 
for maintenance were being handed over to the local authorities in a 
gradual process.

In consultation with the Indian government, we have plans to complete 
the whole exercise by November this year," he said. "Work in Assam 
and Arunachal Pradesh is in progress while West Bengal and Sikkim has 
been halted for now because of the monsoon season."

The Speaker of the National Assembly noted that, as reported by the 
Secretary for International Boundaries, seven out of 15 pillars 
reported during the 83rd session had been erected and that the 
remaining eight pillars would be erected this year. Since it was 
important that all the work be completed before the introduction of 
the Constitution, the Assembly resolved that the survey department 
must complete the work by 2006-07.

By Kinley Y Dorji
[log in to unmask]


*******************************************************
http://www.kuenselonline.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=7125

Bhutan-China boundary must be finalised
Posted on Saturday, June 24, 2006, @ 04:47:38 EDT

National Assembly: 24 June 2006- With growing concerns raised by the 
people the 85th session of the National Assembly resolved that the 
government should continue the ongoing Bhutan-China boundary 
discussions and come to an agreement as soon as possible.

The issue was raised by the Dagana chimi, Karma Samdrup, who said 
that the people were genuinely concerned about the boundary issue 
because they felt that it was directly related to the security of the 
country. "A clear boundary is like a wall protecting the precious 
gem," he said. "We learnt from the militant problem in the south 
that, if we do not act in time, the problem will only deteriorate."

The Samdrup Jongkhar chimi, Yonten Thinley, said more and more people 
believed that the security and independence of the country was at 
stake. "Following the 83rd and 84th sessions, when we had to explain 
that the Chinese had already constructed six roads to our northern 
border, some of them even crossing the border, the people were 
shocked," he said. "They feel that, for a small country, losing even 
a small piece of land would be a big loss. We are being pressed to do 
something and must convey this to the government most urgently."

The Samste chimi, Sangay Khandu, reminded the National Assembly that 
the boundary discussions had been going on for the past 22 years. "We 
would like to know when the government expects to reach an 
agreement," he said, adding that a clear solution must be found 
before the political changes in 2008.

The Haa chimi reminded the National Assembly that the people had 
raised the issue in the 83rd Assembly session because they were 
alarmed when they found out that the Chinese were building roads to 
the northern border. He said that there were major problems with 
three of the six roads because they were on Bhutanese territory.

One road was at Shakhatoe, where the road had penetrated quite deeply 
inside Bhutanese soil. He explained that the people of Haa had always 
used Shakhatoe as a grazing area for their yaks. Another area of 
concern was in Dolepchen where the Chinese started constructing roads 
last year.

The Secretary for International Boundaries, Dasho Pema Wangchuk, 
informed the National Assembly that the concerns expressed by the 
Bhutanese people had already been conveyed to the Chinese side during 
the second Expert Group Meeting held in July, 2005, in Thimphu. He 
said that the Chinese officials had responded by saying that the 
Bhutanese were over-reacting to the road constructions that were 
being carried out for the economic development of the western part of 
China, including Tibet. The Chinese had said that the roads would not 
affect Bhutan in any way and that "the work had been stopped in view 
of Bhutan's concerns and friendly relations between the two countries."

Dasho Pema Wangchuk informed the Assembly that further road 
construction work had not been observed after that, apart from 
maintenance and clearance activities on the roads that had been 
already constructed. He added that the next round of talks - the 18th 
round - was scheduled to be held in Beijing this year and the 
Bhutanese officials were waiting for confirmation from the Chinese government.

The Deputy Speaker of the Assembly, Zhamling Dorji, pointed out that 
the recorded land area of Bhutan was smaller than in the past. "The 
past records show that Bhutan had an area more than 46,000 square 
kilometers but the present figure has been decreased to a little more 
than 38,000 square kilometers," he said. "This is a difference of 
about 8,000 square kilometres and it is a very big area. On one hand, 
we are conducting boundary discussions while, on the other hand, the 
area keeps decreasing. Nobody in the National Assembly ever explains 
why this is happening and nobody has ever asked."

Providing a background on the issue, Dasho Pema Wangchuk explained 
that, when Bhutan introduced planned development in 1961, there was 
no map of the country. The government had asked India for help, 
following which the Indian survey department prepared a map for 
Bhutan. This map was used by Bhutan for a long time.

Between 1963 and 1971, Bhutan was able to finalise the boundary in 
the south, with India, but could not finalise the northern border, 
which made it difficult to establish an accurate map.

To get a better understanding of the northern boundary, Bhutan 
deployed a team of officials from the Survey department, along with 
people who knew the boundary, and verified the extent of the border, 
checked tax payments of the people living in the border areas, and 
the extent of the pasture land. After the survey a map was prepared 
and was presented to the 68th National Assembly in 1989, at a special 
session held in Lungtenphu.

This map has been presented to subsequent National Assembly sessions 
whenever necessary.

According to this map the maximum possible area of Bhutan was 38,394 
square kilometres, Dasho Pema Wangchuk said. A copy of the map was 
even presented to the Chinese government.

Concluding the discussions the Speaker of the Assembly said that, in 
view of the concerns expressed by the people of Bhutan, the 
government should make every attempt to finalise the boundary with 
the Chinese government.

By Tashi Dorji
[log in to unmask]








Dr Brendan Whyte
Geography Department
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
[log in to unmask]
Dr Brendan Whyte
Geography Department
Faculty of Social Sciences
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Mt Scopus
Jerusalem 91905
ISRAEL
[log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager