The markings on a giraffe are as good a 'found drawing' as any,
but more deliberately an artist could in principle become a
breeder of giraffes with the intention that the resulting animals
are marks in the environment.
Is this really all that different from
collecting footprints as drawings, or dropping ink onto paper
and having the splashes be a drawing?
Artists have certainly tatooed animals and people and the
results can be seen as drawings. Maybe another way a giraffe
is a drawing is a like a blank sheet of paper (and someone
must have claimed that for a drawing decades ago).
John
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, Rob Appleby wrote:
> A Giraffe!
>
>
> On 21 Jul 2006, at 12:52, John Stell wrote:
>
>> Challenge: find one thing that is definitely not a drawing.
>>
>
|