Van Snyder wrote:
> Should J3 be considering this for the 2008 revision?
>>http://public.research.att.com/~bs/whitespace98.pdf
Wow, Van, thanks, that was a laugh! My favorites:
"x = ab
c; // old-style: x = a*b+c
This convention is not universally appreciated and more experience is
needed to estimate its impact on maintainability."
or
"In addition to the overloading of missing whitespace, etc., this
distributed version includes overloading based on the color of identifiers."
He is kidding, right?!?
Aleks
|