On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Tim Jenness wrote:
> gfortran is *so* broken with so many problems that a simple "YOU CAN NOT USE
> GFORTRAN IT'S NOT GOOD ENOUGH" in the README is enough :-)
OK, I've done that and recommended that people use g95 for the present. On
the gfortran front, someone seems to be actually working on %VAL. When
this is committed we probably need to re-assess gfortran.
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Stephen Rankin wrote:
>
>> Peter W. Draper wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Stephen Rankin wrote:
>>>
>>>> Just trying the build on 64bit GCC4.02 with both g95 and gfortran
>>>> installed. Setting F77=g95 sill makes configure select f95 (gfortran) but
>>>> setting FC=g95 makes configure get the correct g95 compiler. Is this the
>>>> expected behaviour?
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, in general you need to set F77 and FC to the same value. The
>>> old-style F77 variable is still used by libtool (this should change when
>>> libtool version 2.0 is released).
>>>
>>>> Note, configure stalls with f95:
>>>>
>>>> checking how to preprocess Fortran files...
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, we're aware of that one (it's on the page of problems somewhere on
>>> the wiki).
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Peter.
>> This should probably be in the README then?
>>
>> Steve.
>>
>
> --
> Tim Jenness
> JAC software
> http://www.jach.hawaii.edu/~timj
>
--
Dr. Peter W. Draper, astronomy programmer, http://star-www.dur.ac.uk/~pdraper
|